Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 29;6(7):e22704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022704

Table 2. Age-standardized prevalence of using female sex work among Indian men reporting any non-regular partner in the past year, by region and marital status, 2006.

Unmarried, married or previously married men Unmarried men Married men PR for unmarried vs married men
≥1 FSW ≥1 FSW ≥1 FSW
N n (%)a N n (%)a N n (%)a
India b
15–24 yrs 1630 384 (22.0) 1486 336 (21.1) 138 44 (29.6)
25–34 yrs 1135 443 (37.7) 459 141 (29.4) 656 289 (41.7)
35–49 yrs 658 311 (46.2) 39 17 (42.0) 580 271 (45.4)
Total c 3423 1138 (30.8) 1984 494 (27.2) 1374 604 (35.9) 0.8
(95% CI) (29.2–32.5) (23.7–30.9) (31.5–40.6)
High-HIV states
15–24 yrs 312 96 (30.7) 277 78 (28.1) 34 17 (50.0)
25–34 yrs 302 162 (54.6) 83 40 (48.8) 215 119 (56.5)
35–49 yrs 199 103 (52.7) 5 2 (33.6) 174 86 (50.9)
Total c 813 361 (41.5) 365 120 (35.1) 423 222 (52.0) 0.7
(95% CI) (38.1–45.0) (27.4–43.7) (42.7–61.2)
Low-HIV states
15–24 yrs 1318 288 (20.0) 1209 258 (19.5) 104 27 (23.0)
25–34 yrs 833 281 (31.4) 376 101 (24.8) 441 170 (34.7)
35–49 yrs 459 208 (43.3) 34 15 (43.6) 406 185 (43.0)
Total c 2610 777 (27.4) 1619 374 (25.3) 951 382 (29.9) 0.8
(95% CI) (25.5–29.3) (21.5–29.4) (25.2–35.1)
PR for high-HIV vs low-HIV states 1.5 1.4 1.7

PR = prevalence ratio; FSW = female sex worker; CI = confidence interval.

a

Percentages are sample-weighted.

b

Excludes the northeastern states.

c

Total percentages and 95% CIs are sample-weighted and standardized to the age distribution of all 3423 men in the study sample reporting any non-regular partner in the past year.