Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 29;6(7):e22857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022857

Figure 3. sAPPα modulates the biological activity of Sema3A.

Figure 3

Growth cone morphology was examined in control chick DRG explants (A,E) and in explants challenged for 30 minutes with 0.8 nM Sema3A (B,F), Sema3A+75 nM sAPPα695 (C,G) or Sema3A+sAPPα695+75 nM each of peptides ARSHPAM and LTASLLI (D,H). After fixation and neurofilament immunostaining, growth cone morphology was examined using fluorescence (upper panels) or phase contrast microscopy (lower panels). Scale bars: 10 µm. Representative images (A–H) illustrate on average two growth cones, but more than 700 growth cones were evaluated in each experimental condition. Panel I shows results of quantitative analysis of the percentage of collapsed growth cones (as determined from phase contrast images) in each experimental condition. Bars correspond to means ± SEM of different ganglia. Each experimental condition was replicated 3–6 times in independent experiments using different DRG cultures. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences (**p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test).