Table 6.
Application of the Three Methods to the Type 2 Diabetes Meta-Analysis Results of Scott et al.9
| SNP | I2 | FE p Value | RE p Value | New RE p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs8050136 | 76.80 | 1.30 × 10−12 | 1.48 × 10−2 | 6.60 × 10−13 |
| rs9300039 | 74.95 | 4.33 × 10−7 | 1.53 × 10−2 | 1.83 × 10−7 |
| rs1801282 | 47.42 | 1.72 × 10−6 | 3.41 × 10−4 | 2.16 × 10−6 |
| rs7754840 | 46.44 | 4.09 × 10−11 | 3.17 × 10−6 | 5.69 × 10−11 |
| rs13266634 | 31.60 | 5.34 × 10−8 | 8.68 × 10−6 | 7.23 × 10−8 |
| rs4402960 | 24.67 | 8.57 × 10−16 | 6.48 × 10−12 | 1.61 × 10−15 |
| rs10811661 | 0.00 | 7.76 × 10−15 | 7.76 × 10−15 | 1.41 × 10−14 |
| rs1111875 | 0.00 | 5.74 × 10−10 | 5.74 × 10−10 | 8.63 × 10−10 |
| rs7903146 | 0.00 | 1.03 × 10−48 | 1.03 × 10−48 | 3.39 × 10−48 |
| rs521911 | 0.00 | 6.68 × 10−11 | 6.68 × 10−11 | 1.05 × 10−10 |
The boldface denotes the top p value among three methods.