Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;14(8):951–964. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0453

Table 4.

Major Tools and Related Papers Used to Assess Bereaved Parents and Need-Related Topics

Author, year Country No. of subjectsa Parents no. (%)b Bereaved no. (%)c Patients Setting Items (no.) Constructs measured Reliability and validity
Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care
Seecharan et al., 2004 USA 79 79 (100%) 79 (100%) Pediatric Hospital 35 Satisfaction with care ICR α = 0.54–0.9 for the 10 scales
Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU)
Heyland et al., 2001 Canada 47 4 (9%) 22 (47%) Adult ICU 34 Satisfaction with care and decision-making Content validity—experts; Satisfaction with care—4 investigator-derived domains, ICR α = 0.74–0.97 for the 4 domains; Satisfaction with decision-making-2 domains, ICR α = 0.87 and 0.93 for the 2 domains; test-retest reliability (Spearman's correlation = 0.85)
Wall et al., 2007 Canada & US 1,038 108 (10%) + (% ND) Adult (% ND) Pediatric (% ND) ICU & Burn-PICU 24 Satisfaction with care and decision making Construct validity—factor analysis yields 2 domains; Item-subscale correlations 0.38–0.79; ICR α = 0.94 for total scale; ICR α = 0.92 and 0.88 for the 2 domains; FS-ICU correlated with Family QODDd total score, single QODD items and multiple nurse assessed quality indicators.
Wall et al., 2007 US 539 88 (16%) 275 (51%) Adult ICU 24 Satisfaction with care and decision making -
Gries et al., 2008 US 356 17 (5%) 356 (100%) Adult ICU 10 Satisfaction with decision making -
Curtis et al., 2008 US 275 + (% ND) 275 (100%) Adult ICU 24 Satisfaction with care and decision making -
a

Total sample size (all are family members unless otherwise specified).

b

Number and percentage of parents in family sample.

c

Number and percentage of bereaved in family sample.

d

Quality of Death and Dying Questionnaire.

+, factor present; −, factor not present or not described.

ND, not described; ICR, internal consistency reliability; α, Cronbach's α.