Table 4.
Author, year | Country | No. of subjectsa | Parents no. (%)b | Bereaved no. (%)c | Patients | Setting | Items (no.) | Constructs measured | Reliability and validity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care | |||||||||
Seecharan et al., 2004 | USA | 79 | 79 (100%) | 79 (100%) | Pediatric | Hospital | 35 | Satisfaction with care | ICR α = 0.54–0.9 for the 10 scales |
Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) | |||||||||
Heyland et al., 2001 | Canada | 47 | 4 (9%) | 22 (47%) | Adult | ICU | 34 | Satisfaction with care and decision-making | Content validity—experts; Satisfaction with care—4 investigator-derived domains, ICR α = 0.74–0.97 for the 4 domains; Satisfaction with decision-making-2 domains, ICR α = 0.87 and 0.93 for the 2 domains; test-retest reliability (Spearman's correlation = 0.85) |
Wall et al., 2007 | Canada & US | 1,038 | 108 (10%) | + (% ND) | Adult (% ND) Pediatric (% ND) | ICU & Burn-PICU | 24 | Satisfaction with care and decision making | Construct validity—factor analysis yields 2 domains; Item-subscale correlations 0.38–0.79; ICR α = 0.94 for total scale; ICR α = 0.92 and 0.88 for the 2 domains; FS-ICU correlated with Family QODDd total score, single QODD items and multiple nurse assessed quality indicators. |
Wall et al., 2007 | US | 539 | 88 (16%) | 275 (51%) | Adult | ICU | 24 | Satisfaction with care and decision making | - |
Gries et al., 2008 | US | 356 | 17 (5%) | 356 (100%) | Adult | ICU | 10 | Satisfaction with decision making | - |
Curtis et al., 2008 | US | 275 | + (% ND) | 275 (100%) | Adult | ICU | 24 | Satisfaction with care and decision making | - |
Total sample size (all are family members unless otherwise specified).
Number and percentage of parents in family sample.
Number and percentage of bereaved in family sample.
Quality of Death and Dying Questionnaire.
+, factor present; −, factor not present or not described.
ND, not described; ICR, internal consistency reliability; α, Cronbach's α.