Table 2.
Significance of differences in accuracies between all SNP models
Model | Scenario | rg1 | Trait | G vs. BCπ0 | G vs. BSSVS | BCπ0 vs. BSSVS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ST | 1 | 1 | *** | *** | ||
1 | 0.25 | 2 | ||||
1 | 0.54 | 2 | ||||
1 | 0.75 | 2 | ||||
2 | 1 | |||||
2 | 0.25 | 2 | ||||
2 | 0.54 | 2 | ||||
2 | 0.75 | 2 | ||||
MT | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | *** | *** | *** |
1 | 0.54 | 1 | *** | *** | *** | |
1 | 0.75 | 1 | *** | *** | *** | |
1 | 0.25 | 2 | *** | *** | * | |
1 | 0.54 | 2 | *** | *** | * | |
1 | 0.75 | 2 | *** | *** | * | |
2 | 0.25 | 1 | *** | *** | ||
2 | 0.54 | 1 | *** | *** | ** | |
2 | 0.75 | 1 | *** | *** | ** | |
2 | 0.25 | 2 | *** | *** | ||
2 | 0.54 | 2 | *** | *** | ||
2 | 0.75 | 2 | *** | *** |
Comparisons are between ST and MT models for animals without any phenotypes (generation 3) between pairwise SNP-based models across scenarios, genetic correlations (rg), and traits
1Phenotypes for trait 1 were the same across genetic correlations, and therefore analyzed only once with each ST model; *** P-value < 0.001, ** P-value < 0.01, * P-value < 0.05