Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 27;40(3):719–728. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq259

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses of the lung cancer risk associated with household coal use for heating and cooking in mainland China and Taiwan

Subgroups within mainland China and Taiwan Number of studies Heterogeneity [I2 (%); P-value] OR (95% CI)
Gender
    Female 8 80.9; 5.3 × 10−6 2.50 (1.56–4.00)
    Male 3 82.4; 0.003 2.76 (1.44–5.27)
    Non-smoking females 3 0.0; 0.433 2.93 (1.40–6.12)
    Non-smoking males 0 Not applicable Not applicable
Geographical setting
    Only studies carried out in an urban setting 9 92.8; 1.6 × 10−22 2.35 (1.44–3.84)
    Only studies carried out in a rural setting 3 83.4; 0.002 3.28 (1.46–7.39)
Type of questionnaire used to assess coal exposuresa
    Only studies utilizing a qualitative question to assess coal exposure 13 92.5; 7.9 × 10−28 2.16 (1.43–3.26)
    Only studies utilizing a quantitative question to assess coal exposure 7 81.5; 1.4 × 10−5 2.49 (1.47–4.20)
Publication language
    Only studies published in English 11 94.7; 3.9 × 10−35 2.36 (1.42–3.94)
    Only studies published in Chinese 9 0.0; 0.87 2.01 (1.69–2.40)
Sample size of study
    Only studies with greater than 800 subjects 6 87.5; 1.5 × 10−7 2.27 (1.43–3.59)
    Only studies with less than 800 subjects 14 88.5; 4.2 × 10−18 2.24 (1.51–3.32)
Study design
    Only population-based case–control studies 13 93.2; 1.8 × 10−31 2.57 (1.64–4.03)
    Only hospital-based case–control studies 6 0.0; 0.89 1.75 (1.47–2.09)

aAll studies assessed exposure using a questionnaire. The questions used were classified into qualitative (i.e. questions with yes/no responses, such as do you burn coal at home?) and quantitative (i.e. number of years of exposure or amount of coal use).