Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 11;40(3):681–684. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr085

Table 1.

The ‘2011 Scorecard’

Supports protective effect of breastfeeding?
Type of Study Yes Maybe No
Cluster randomized controlled trial of breastfeeding promotion No effects on anthropometric outcomes at 6.5 or 11.5 years of age, but observational data within the cohort show no (or slightly +) association
Cohort studies, mostly White European descent Three pooled meta-analyses of (dichotomous) obesity show modest associations, but limited confounder control One individual-level meta-analysis of mean BMI shows no effect after confounding control, but limited number of studies with sufficient data
Cohort studies in developing countries and racial/ethnic minorities Many are null, but in some misclassification of exposure may exist
Sib-pair analyses in cohort studies Three studies suggest effect, but low power
Comparison of cohorts with different confounding structure One study suggests that confounding explains observed associations
‘Reverse causality?’ A few studies suggest this phenomenon, but could be in opposite direction to hypothesis
Biological effects of breast milk Conflicting data on adipokines
Biological effects of formula RCTs of high vs low protein (+/− energy) result in more adiposity and related outcomes
Behavioural effects of nursing Short-term studies suggest less self-regulation in bottle- vs breast-fed infants
Ecological analysis Breastfeeding rates have gone up along with emergence of the obesity epidemic, but that does not rule out inverse individual-level effects

Summarizing evidence for and against the hypothesis that having been breastfed reduces the risk of obesity.