Table 1.
The ‘2011 Scorecard’
Supports protective effect of breastfeeding? |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Type of Study | Yes | Maybe | No |
Cluster randomized controlled trial of breastfeeding promotion | No effects on anthropometric outcomes at 6.5 or 11.5 years of age, but observational data within the cohort show no (or slightly +) association | ||
Cohort studies, mostly White European descent | Three pooled meta-analyses of (dichotomous) obesity show modest associations, but limited confounder control | One individual-level meta-analysis of mean BMI shows no effect after confounding control, but limited number of studies with sufficient data | |
Cohort studies in developing countries and racial/ethnic minorities | Many are null, but in some misclassification of exposure may exist | ||
Sib-pair analyses in cohort studies | Three studies suggest effect, but low power | ||
Comparison of cohorts with different confounding structure | One study suggests that confounding explains observed associations | ||
‘Reverse causality?’ | A few studies suggest this phenomenon, but could be in opposite direction to hypothesis | ||
Biological effects of breast milk | Conflicting data on adipokines | ||
Biological effects of formula | RCTs of high vs low protein (+/− energy) result in more adiposity and related outcomes | ||
Behavioural effects of nursing | Short-term studies suggest less self-regulation in bottle- vs breast-fed infants | ||
Ecological analysis | Breastfeeding rates have gone up along with emergence of the obesity epidemic, but that does not rule out inverse individual-level effects |
Summarizing evidence for and against the hypothesis that having been breastfed reduces the risk of obesity.