Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Elem Sch J. 2011 Jun;111(4):535–560. doi: 10.1086/659031

Table 1.

Student demographic Data

Variables Treatment Group (n=305)
Contrast Group (n=251)
p
M SD M SD
Age at fall testing 5.21 0.37 5.19 0.35 .534
Nonverbal IQ K 91.80 12.44 93.50 10.47 .087
Verbal IQ K 92.14 15.16 93.33 14.00 .341
Picture Vocabulary WJ 99.65 10.80 99.86 10.94 .817
Absence* 7.04 9.41 3.29 5.34 .000*
n % n % p

Male 164 53.77 125 49.80 .351
Ethnicity .924
 Caucasian 105 34.43 83 33.07
 Black 175 57.38 151 60.16
 Hispanic 14 4.59 10 3.98
 Other 11 3.61 7 2.79
Eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch 182 59.67 137 54.58 .248
Retained 35 11.48 25 9.96 .543
Special Education Classification
 Speech/Language 55 18.03 21 8.37 .202
 EMH, DD, ASD 4 1.31 8 3.19 .394
 Sensory Impaired 4 1.31 3 1.20 .890
 Orthopedically or OHI 8 2.62 1 0.40 .037
 Learning Disabled 1 0.33 2 0.80 .356
 Gifted 1 0.33 3 1.20 .289

Note.

K

= Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004);

WJ

= Woodcock Johnson III (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001)

EMH = Educably Mentally Handicapped; DD = Developmentally Delayed; ASD = Autism Spectrum Disorders; OHI = Other Health Impaired

*

n=284 for treatment; n=242 for contrast.

p-value is computed using ANOVA.

p-value is computed using Chi-square test.

*

= significant at the p = .05 level after the Benjamini Hochman correction was applied.