Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Elem Sch J. 2011 Jun;111(4):535–560. doi: 10.1086/659031

Table 3.

Instructional Effectiveness

Contrast (n = 21)
Treatment (n = 23)
p
M SD M SD
Fall Quality of Instruction
Organization of instruction 2.10 0.70 1.91 0.95 .476
Warmth & Sensitivity 1.95 0.74 1.83 0.83 .599
Level of classroom on-task behaviors 2.10 0.70 1.96 0.56 .471
Fall Instructional Effectiveness
Phonological Awareness 2.10 0.89 2.09 1.08 .978
Alphabetics 1.76 0.83 2.09 0.73 .175
Decoding 1.62 0.80 2.09 0.85 .068
Vocabulary 1.33 1.06 1.57 1.16 .495
Comprehension 1.62 1.07 1.83 1.15 .542
Fluency 0.19 0.60 0.26 0.75 .735
Spelling 0.76 1.09 1.48 1.12 .038
Writing 1.10 1.00 2.22 0.90 .000*
Child Managed Activities 1.76 1.18 2.30 1.02 .109
Other Adults 0.95 0.92 1.26 1.21 .351
Winter Quality of Instruction
Organization of instruction 2.29 0.72 2.04 0.88 .325
Warmth & Sensitivity 2.19 0.81 2.26 0.75 .767
Level of classroom on-task behaviors 2.33 0.66 2.13 0.63 .301
Winter Instructional Effectiveness
Phonological Awareness 2.62 0.74 2.35 0.83 .261
Alphabetics 1.90 0.94 1.74 1.21 .618
Decoding 2.00 0.95 2.17 0.83 .521
Vocabulary 1.29 1.15 1.48 1.20 .590
Comprehension 2.19 1.17 1.87 1.10 .353
Fluency 0.52 0.81 0.43 0.84 .724
Spelling 0.19 0.51 1.00 1.17 .005*
Writing 0.86 0.57 1.70 0.88 .001*
Child Managed Activities 2.48 0.93 2.26 1.01 .467
Other Adults 1.38 1.24 1.96 1.02 .100

Note. All items were on a 0–3 scale, where 0 indicated not observed, 1 indicated not effective, 2 indicated effective, and 3 indicated highly effective.

*

= significant at the p = .05 level after the Benjamini Hochman correction was applied.