Table 1.
Dates of study | Population sampled | Country | Sample size | Population characteristics | Definitions | Results | Quality assessment checklist(*) (Y: Yes, N: No, NA: Not Applicable) |
Study limitations | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men (%) | Age (years; range unless specified) | Residency status; area(s) of residence | Overweight (if not 25 to < 30) | Obesity (if not ≥ 30) | Prevalence overweight (%) | Prevalence obesity (%) | ||||||||
Men | Women | Men | Women | |||||||||||
1980– 198148 | PC | Kuwait | 1171 | 0 | 18 to >60 | Kuwaiti nationals | >25 | 59.2 | 32.2 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-Some, 7-NA | Sample selection method not clear Limitation of the study not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
|||
1980–198149 | PC | Kuwait | 2067 | 43.3 | 18 to >60 | Kuwaiti nationals | >25 | 21.7–69.4 (age- dependent) | as Al-Isa, 1997a (above) | 8.5–24.1 (age- dependent) | as Al-Isa, 1997a (above) | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Sample selection method not clear Limitation of the study not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
|
1985–198827 | GP | KSA | 17892 | 48.5 | 18 to <61 | Saudi nationals | 30.7 | 28.4 | 14.2 | 23.6 | 1-Y, 2-N, 3-N, 4-N, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Sample selection method not clearly Data analysis not clear Educational/employment status of the sample not reported Limitation of the study not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
||
NR28 | GP | KSA | 3171 | 45.9 | >15 | >27 in men, | >25 in women | 30.1 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Unconventional definition of obesity Selection methods of houses for sampling not clear Dates of study not clear Limitation of the study not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
||||
1991–199251 | GP | Bahrain | 290 | 47.2 | 20–65 | Urban/rural mix | 26.3 | 29.4 | 16.0 | 31 | 1-Y, 2- Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Selection procedure not well described Statistical analysis not described Limitation of the study not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
||
1990–199329 | GP | KSA | 13177 | 52 | 15 to >60 | Saudi nationals | 33.1 | 29.4 | 17.8 | 26.6 | 1-Y, 2-Incomplete, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-Some, 7-NA | The sample may not be truly representative for the general Saudi diabetic patients (sample randomly selected from National Epidemiological Household Study for Chronic Metabolic Diseases) Limitation of the study not discussed |
||
1990–199330 | PC | KSA | 3261 | 49.5 | 30–70 | Saudi nationals; urban/rural mix | 41.91 | 31.55 | 29.94 | 49.15 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Limitations of the study not discussed Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
||
199231 | PC | KSA | 1385 | 0 | 16–70 | Urban/rural mix | 26.8 | 47.0 | 1-Y, 2-Incomplete, 3- Y, 4- Y, 5-N, 6- Some, 7-NA | Recruitment process not specified Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
||||
NR54 | SP | UAE | 215 | 0 | 18–30 | Emirati nationals | 19 | 9.8 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-Some, 7-NA | The sample may not be truly representative for the general Emirate population (sample from UAE female university only) Limitation of the study not discussed clearly |
||||
199432 | PC | KSA | 1580 | 100 | >16 | Urban/rural mix | 34.8 | 28.6 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Limitation of the study not discussed | ||||
1993–199433 | Military hospital | KSA | 1485 | 46.1 | 18–91 | Saudi nationals | 40.1 | 31.5 | 21 | 40.5 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Specific population sampled Limitations of the study not discussed |
||
1993–199434 | WP* | KSA | 2990 | NR† | <25 to >60 | 94.7% Saudi nationals | 30.3 | 24.5 | 1-N, 2-N, 3-N, 4-N, 5-N, 6-Y, 7-NA | Sample selection methods not well described Potential of selection bias samples misses more complicated cases ('referred to hospital clinic') Sampled population relatively unrepresentative of general population(National Guard employees and dependants) Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
||||
1993–199447 | PC‡ | Kuwait | 1705 | 0 | 18 to >60 | Kuwaiti nationals | >25 | 72.9 | 40.6 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Limitations of the study not discussed Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
|||
1993–199448 | PC§ | Kuwait | 3435 | 50.3 | 18 to >60 | Kuwaiti nationals | >25 | 44.3–75.1 (age- dependent) | as Al-Isa, 1997a (above) | 17.1–35.6 (age- dependent) | as Al-Isa, 1997a (above) | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Limitations of the study not discussed Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
|
NR55 | SC | UAE | 4075 | 43.9 | 6–17 | UAE nationals | Overweight 85th–95th percentile Obesity >95th percentile or BMI >30 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 1-Y, 2- Incomplete methods of selection, 3- Y 4- Y, 5-N, 6- partially, 7-NA | Method of study sample recruitment not clear Lack of standardization Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
|
NR35 | SC | KSA | 14660 | 42.0 | 14–70 | Saudi nationals | 27.23 | 25.20 | 13.05 | 20.26 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-N, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Data analysis was not discussed clearly Study limitations not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
||
NR52 | GP | Bahrain | 2013 | 58.0 | Men 40–59 Women 50–69 | Bahraini nationals | 39.9 | 32.7 | 25.3 | 33.2‡‡ | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Limitations of the study not discussed Method of blood sampling not clear |
||
1998 – 199956 | SC | UAE | 898 | 0 | 11–18 | Overweight: 85th –95th percentile Obesity: > 95th percentile | 14 | 9 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-Some, 7-NA | Results might be biased as all the measurements were collected by one investigator only Limitations of the study not discussed |
||||
1998–200050 | WP** | Kuwait | 9755 | 48.0 | Mean age + SD: Women 33.3 + 11.6; Men 29.2 + 8.2 | Kuwaiti nationals | 38.3 | 32.8 | 27.5 | 29.9 | 1-Y, 2-Incomplete, 3-N, 4-N, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Sample recruitment method not discussed clearly Data analysis not clear Study limitations not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
||
1998 – 199957 | SC | UAE | 4381 | 49.6 | 5–17 | 48.0% UAE citizens; 81.7% urban | IOFT criteria | 19.2 | 19.8 | 13.1 | 12.4 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Secondary data analysis Limitations of the study not discussed |
|
1998–200049 | WP** | Kuwait | 740 | 100 | 45–80 | Kuwaiti nationals | 37 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-Some, 7-NA | Sample recruitment method not discussed clearly Study limitations not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
|||||
1999–200066 | WP†† | Kuwait | 3282 | 85 | 54 % <40 | 62% Kuwaiti nationals | 48 | 27 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Data on the population characteristics including age and ethnic origin was limited Details on the method of blood sampling was not clear Study limitations not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
||||
1999–200058 | GP§ | UAE | 724 | 0 | 20 to >60 | UAE nationals | 30–40 | 27 | 16 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Potential of sample selection bias (recruitment via students at one university) Steps taken to minimize bias not discussed |
|||
200061 | GP | Oman | 5838 | 49.8 | 20 to >80 | Omani nationals; urban/rural mix | 28.9 | 18.5 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Procedure for determining BMI not reported Steps taken to minimize bias were not discussed Limitations of the study were not discussed |
||||
NR36 | GP | KSA | 11208 | 41.3 | 20–70 | Saudi nationals | 32.82 | 29.09 | 15.21 | 23.97 | 1-Y, 2-Incomplete, 3- Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Method not discussed clearly Sample selection was not clear Study limitations were not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias were not discussed |
||
1999– 200059 | GP | UAE | 5844 | 42.8 | 20 to >65 | UAE residents; '80% urban' | 48 | 35 | 24 | 40 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Sampling method of purposely biased population 'non-institutionalized' Steps taken to minimize bias were not discussed |
||
200062 | GP | Oman | 5847 | 48.8 | 20 to >60 | 900 urban; 4947 rural | 19.1 | 1-Y, 2-Incomplete, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-N, 6-Y, 7-NA | Secondary data collection Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
|||||
2001–200237 | SP | KSA | 701 | 100 | Mean age 21.7 years | Saudi nationals | 31 | 23.3 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-Some, 7-NA | The selected sample might not be representative for the whole population ( the selected sample might not be representative sample ) Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
||||
2001–200267 | YP | KSA | 894 | 100 | 12–20 | 13.8 | 20.5 | 1-Y, 2- Incomplete, 3-N, 4- Y, 5-N, 6- N, 7, NA | Sampling method not discussed clearly Data analysis not clear |
|||||
2004–200560 | PC | UAE | 817 | 49.3 | 20 to >60 | UAE nationals | 28.3 | 46.5 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-N, 5-Y, 6- N, 7-NA | Statistical analysis was not described clearly Study limitations not discussed |
||||
NR38 | SP | KSA | 241 | 100 | Mean age + SD: 21.2 + 1.3 | 29.9 | 16.6 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-N, 5-N, 6-N, 7-NA | Data analysis was not described clearly Study limitations were not discussed Steps taken to minimize bias were not discussed |
|||||
2007 – 200865 | GP | Qatar | 1117 | 51.1 | 20–59 | Urban/semi-urban | 31.9 | 45.2 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-Some, 7-NA | The selected sample might not be representative sample As the recruitment of subjects is from primary healthcare centres, there may be a possibility that this sample is biased | ||||
200539 | SC | KSA | 19317 | 50.8 | 5–18 | Saudi nationals | WHO 2007 criteria | 24.8 | 28.4 | 10.1 | 8.4 | 1-Y, 2-Y, 3-Y, 4-Y, 5-Y, 6-N, 7-NA | Limitations of the study not discussed Data on the steps taken to minimize bias not clear |
Summary of cross-sectional studies investigating the prevalence of overweight/obesity in the GCC region
*Employees of Saudi National Guard and dependents
†‘Mostly settled tribal men’
‡Attendees at primary healthcare centres with minor complaints, plus accompanying persons
§All subjects recruited via family member at UAE University
**Adult attendees of the Kuwait Medical Council and Public Authority for Social Security (government employed/retired population)
††Employees of Kuwait Oil Company
‡‡Age-adjusted data
(*)Quality assessment checklist adapted from the Centre of Reviews and Dissemination guidelines (CRD) for non-randomized studies:
(1) Was the aim of the study stated clearly?
(2) Was the methodology stated? And was it appropriate?
(3) Were appropriate methods used for data collection and analysis?
(4) Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?
(5) Were preventive steps taken to minimize bias?
(6) Were limitations of the study discussed?
In systematic review, was search strategy adequate and appropriate?
PC = primary healthcare-registered population; GP = general population; WP = working population; SC = schoolchildren; SP = student population; YP = young population