Table 2.
Relationships between the five Methylophilaceae strains compared in this work based on 16S rRNA gene identity and on percentage of common proteins
| Strain | Gene or protein identitya with: |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mt. mobilis JLW8 | Mt. versatilis 301 | Mv. glucosetrophus SIP3-4 | Mb. flagellatus KT | Methylophilales strain HTCC 2181 | |
| Mt. mobilis LW8 | 96.6 | 94.3 | 93.8 | 94.6 | |
| Mt. versatilis 301 | 51.6 | 93.5 | 93.6 | 94.3 | |
| Mv. glucosetrophus SIP3-4 | 33.6 | 29.6 | 96.5 | 93.9 | |
| Mb. flagellatus KT | 29.6 | 25.9 | 38.7 | 92.9 | |
| Methylophilales strain HTCC2181 | 17.0 | 16.9 | 15.7 | 15.2 | |
a
16S rRNA identity is shown in the upper right and percentage of common proteins (at 70% identity) in the lower left.