Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Aug;8(8):600–607. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2391

Table 1.

Comparisons of the proposed segregation factors

Segregation factors Remarks Our interpretation
Chromosome tethering to the
membrane and growth55
  • The replicated ori moves much faster than the elongation rate of the cell24

  • This may play a part in maintaining the DNA in the concentric shell

MreB56 (an actin homologue)
  • Escherichia coli and filamentous cyanobacteria are viable without MreB57,58

  • For Caulobcter crescentus, the role of MreB is conditional27

  • A recent study shows the functional interaction between MreB and Topo IV40

  • This could contribute to efficient segregation by maintaining a high aspect ratio of the cell

ParM6 (an actin homologue)
  • This has been described as a factor involved in plasmid segregation

  • ParM is not conserved in all bacteria and probably only functions for plasmids

ParA27
  • This has been described as a factor involved in plasmid segregation

  • For chromosomes, it has a proposed role in ori movement in the initial stage of the cell cycle in C. crescentus and Vibrio cholerae 25,27

  • There is no evidence for a role in bulk chromosome segregation

  • This may help to extrude the newly synthesized DNA to the periphery of the nucleoid

  • It is particularly helpful for the initial separation of the duplicated ori, when there is not enough DNA-scarce space in the periphery of the nucleoid in some organisms (for example, C. crescentus)

migS and the bacterial
‘centromere’ (REF. 59)
  • The mutant has a minor phenotype59

  • It is unlikely that the putative bacterial ‘centromere’ plays a notable role in bulk chromosome segregation

MukB60 and SMC proteins
  • Cells are usually conditionally viable without them4,23

  • These proteins increase the correlation length of the chromosome to promote efficient segregation

  • They have interchangeable roles with other factors that increase the repulsive interactions between DNA (for example, an increased level of negative supercoiling)

Extrusion–capture30
  • Replication forks are independent in slow-growing E. coli cells31,32

  • This may help to extrude the newly synthesized DNA to the periphery of the nucleoid

RNA polymerase34
  • Its role can be tested by the run-off DNA synthesis experiment (that is, by blocking protein synthesis)

  • This may help to extrude the newly synthesized DNA to the periphery of the nucleoid

Coupling of transcription and
translation, and membrane
transertion35
  • Its role can be tested by the run-off DNA synthesis experiment (that is, by blocking protein synthesis)

  • This may help to extrude the newly synthesized DNA to the periphery of the nucleoid

Mechanical pushing (can be
induced by cohesion)47,48
  • Although they differ in their biological details, this model has the same view as the entropy model: that the intrinsic physical and mechanical properties of the chromosome are important for its biological function

  • This can be understood in terms of excluded-volume interaction and conformational entropy

Excluded-volume interactions,
chain-connectivity and
conformational entropy15
  • The phase diagram presented in FIG. 1 explains the demixing of individual bulk chromosomes but does not consider the segregation of multiple chromosomes

  • Current work should be extended to incorporate the effect of chromosome topology (for example, the branched structure of supercoiled plectonemes)

  • NA

NA, not applicable; ori, origin; Par, plasmid partition protein; SMC, structural maintenance of chromosomes.