Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 28;2:48. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00048

Table 1.

Structural magnetic resonance brain imaging studies comparing maltreated to non-maltreated individuals.

Brain regions Studies# ED Mean age years Sample Summary of results
HIPP De Bellis et al. (1999b) No 12.1 44 MP vs. 61 NM n.s.
Carrion et al. (2001) No 11.0 24 MP vs. 24 NM n.s.
Mehta et al. (2009) Yes 16.1 14 M vs. 11 NM n.s.
Carrion et al. (2007) No 10.4 15 MP Cortisol levels and PTSD symptoms predicted the degree of hippocampal volume reduction
Pederson et al. (2004) No 25.1 17 MP vs. 17 M vs. 17 NM n.s.
Vythilingam et al. (2002) No 31.3 21 MD vs. 11 DEP vs. 14 NM MD < DEP = NM, left hippocampus, right hippocampus: n.s.
Vermetten et al. (2006) No 38.7 15 MDI vs. 23 NM M < NM, left and right hippocampus
AMY Mehta et al. (2009) Yes 16.1 14 M vs. 11 NM M > NM, right amygdala, left amygdala: trend
Tottenham et al. (2010) Yes 9.0 34 M vs. 26 NM M > NM, but only for those adopted after 15 months of age (n = 17)
Vermetten et al. (2006) No 38.7 15 MDI vs. 23 NM M < NM, left and right amygdala
Bremner et al. (1997) No 41.3 17 MP vs. 17 NM n.s.
Andersen et al. (2008) No 19.7 26 M vs. 17 NM n.s.
CC/WM Mehta et al. (2009) Yes 16.1 14 M vs. 11 NM n.s.
De Bellis et al. (1999b) No 12.1 44 MP vs. 61 NM M < NM
De Bellis et al. (2002) No 11.5 28 MP vs. 66 NM M < NM
De Bellis and Keshavan (2003) No 67 MP vs. 122 NM M < NM
Teicher et al. (2004) No 12.4 51 M vs. 115 NM M < NM
Jackowski et al. (2008) No 10.6 17 MP vs. 15 NM M < NM
Govindan et al. (2010) Yes 11.3 17 M vs. 15 NM M < NM, FA values in left/right UF, left/right SLF, left/right AF
Eluvathingal et al. (2006) Yes 10.2 7 M vs. 7 NM M < NM, FA values in left uncinate fasciculus
Kitayama et al. (2007) No 37.3 9 MP vs. 9 NM M < NM, area of the posterior midbody of the corpus callosum
Choi et al. (2009) No 21.5 16 M vs. 16 NM M < NM, FA values in left arcuate fasciculus, left cingulum bundle, left body of the fornix
PFC De Bellis et al. (1999b) No 12.1 44 MP vs. 61 NM n.s.
De Bellis et al. (2002) No 11.5 28 MP vs. 66 NM M < NM, PFC volume and PFC white matter
Richert et al. (2006) No 11.0 23 MP vs. 23 NM M > NM, GMV in the middle-inferior and ventral regions of the PFC
Carrion et al. (2009)* No 11.0 24 MP vs. 24 NM Manual tracing: M > NM, GMV inleft/right/superior/inferior regions of the PFC; VBM: M > NM, volume of ventral PFC
Hanson et al. (2010)** No 11.9 31 M vs. 41NM M < NM, orbitofrontal cortex GMV, which correlated negatively with social functioning difficulties
Tomoda et al. (2009)* No 21.7 23 M vs. 22 NM M < NM, gray matter volume in the left dorsolateral PFC and the right medial PFC
Treadway et al. (2009)* No 32.8 19 MD vs. 19 NM M < NM, reduced volume of the rostral ACC
van Harmelen et al. (2010)* No 37.6 84 M vs. 97 NM M < NM, left dorsal medial PFC

ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; AF, arcuate fasciculus; AMY, Amygdala; CC, corpus callosum; DEP, depression; ED, early deprivation; GMV, gray matter volume; HIPP, hippocampus; M, maltreated; MD, maltreated with depression; MDI, maltreated with dissociation; MP, maltreated with PTSD/PTSD symptomatology; NM, non-maltreated; n.s., not statistically significant; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; UF, uncinate fasciculus; VBM, voxel-based morphometry; WM, white matter.

#All the studies used manual tracing to define their region of interest except: * Voxel-based morphometry; ** Tensor-based morphometry.