Table 1.
Meta Analysis | Progeny Production |
p Values* |
#Trials | #AL | #BD | |||
Genotype | AL AVG ± SD | BD AVG ± SD | BD vs AL | AL vs wt | BD vs wt | |||
wild-type D11 mating | 2.4 ± 5.1 | 20.1 ± 26.2 | <.001 | N/A | N/A | 4 | 55 | 45 |
wild-type D14 mating | 0.5 ± 1.4 | 14.3 ± 20.5 | <.001 | N/A | N/A | 5 | 60 | 60 |
wild-type ts D11 mating | 4.1 ± 1.4 | 10.3 ± 20.8 | .85 | N/A | N/A | 2 | 20 | 20 |
wild-type ts D14 mating | 2.6 ± 3.4 | 3.8 ± 6.0 | .96 | N/A | N/A | 2 | 20 | 20 |
pha-4 ts D11 mating | 3.1 ± 5.3 | 9.8 ± 12.6 | .06 | .16 | .42 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
pha-4 ts D14 mating | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 6.2 | .01 | .02 | .71 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
fog-2 D11 mating | 9.4 ± 11.1 | 14.1 ± 21.7 | .78 | <.001 | .46 | 2AL/1 BD | 23 | 10 |
fog-2 D14 mating | 2.8 ± 5.0 | 10.0 ± 14.2 | .009 | .002 | .45 | 3 | 28 | 30 |
daf-16 D11 mating | 0.5 ± 1.4 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | .33 | .10 | <.001 | 3 | 30 | 30 |
daf-16 D14 mating | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.6 | .16 | <.001 | <.001 | 3 | 30 | 30 |
hsf-1 D11 mating | 0.1 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 1.0 | .02 | <.001 | <.001 | 3 | 30 | 30 |
hsf-1 D14 mating | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.5 | 1.00 | <.001 | <.001 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
skn-1 D14 mating | 0.1 ± 0.5 | 0.8± 3.9 | .69 | .11 | <.001 | 3 | 28 | 30 |
nhr-49 D11 mating | 0.3 ± 1.8 | 0.03 ± 0.2 | 1.00 | .001 | <.001 | 3 | 30 | 30 |
nhr-49 D14 mating | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.00 | <.001 | <.001 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
cup-4 D11 mating | 7.0 ± 7.3 | 16.2 ± 22.4 | .13 | .001 | .55 | 3 | 30 | 30 |
nlp-7 D11 mating | 0.2 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 7.0 | .007 | .02 | <.001 | 3 | 30 | 30 |
NP717 D14 mating | 0.4 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 2.1 | .81 | .35 | <.001 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
Notes: AL = ad libitum; AVG = average; BD = bacterially deprived; wt = wild type.
All data sets analyzed failed tests for normal distribution.