Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Rev. 2011 May 4;21(2):148–166. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9169-7

Table 2.

Number (%) of children meeting criterion for delay and trace conditioning at school age by diagnostic group and session during which child first met criterion Values are number of children (%) who met the criterion of at least 40% conditioned responses (CR) in a session

Alcohol-exposed
Nonexposed Total
FAS Heavy exposed Control
Delay conditioning
 Session 1 0 (0.0) 6 (21.4) 12 (41.4) 18 (28.6)
 Session 2 2 (33.3) 6 (21.4) 11 (37.9) 19 (30.2)
 Session 3 1 (16.7) 4 (14.3) 3 (10.3) 8 (12.7)
 Session 4 1 (16.7) 1 (3.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.2)
 Total conditioned 4 (66.7) 17 (60.7) 26 (89.7) 47 (74.6)
 Total N 6 28 29 63
Trace conditioning
 Session 1 1 (16.7) 2 (14.3) 3 (25.0) 6 (18.8)
 Session 2 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1) 5 (41.7) 6 (18.8)
 Session 3 1 (16.7) 4 (28.6) 0 (0.0) 5 (15.6)
 Session 4 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.1)
 Total conditioned 2 (33.3) 8 (57.1) 8 (66.7) 18 (56.3)
 Total N 6 14 12 32