Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 27;103(15):1152–1161. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr206

Table 3.

Unadjusted performance at facilities by months since implementation of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD)*

Sample size or performance outcome All CAD facilities, 1998–2006 (n = 25)
Group 1 (n = 6)
Group 2 (n = 19)
Pre-CAD 3–12 mo post-CAD >12 mo post-CAD Pre-CAD 3–12 mo post-CAD >12 mo post-CAD Pre-CAD 3–12 mo post-CAD >12 mo post-CAD
No. of total mammograms 404 310 88 556 164 870 79 465 22 121 62 480 324 845 66 435 102 390
No. of mammograms for women with cancer 1837 350 663 411 117 266 1426 233 397
Specificity, % (95% CI) 91.9 (91.8 to 92.0) 91.5 (91.3 to 91.7) 91.4 (91.2 to 91.5) 90.3 (90.1 to 90.5) 87.5 (87.1 to 87.9) 88.8 (88.5 to 89.0) 92.3 (92.2 to 92.4) 92.8 (92.6 to 93.0) 92.9 (92.8 to 93.1)
Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 79.7 (77.8 to 81.5) 83.1 (78.8 to 86.9) 80.1 (76.8 to 83.1) 79.8 (75.6 to 83.6) 88.9 (81.7 to 93.9) 81.6 (76.4 to 86.1) 79.7 (77.5 to 81.7) 80.3 (74.6 to 85.2) 79.1 (74.8 to 83.0)
Positive predictive value, % (95% CI) 4.3 (4.1 to 4.5) 3.7 (3.3 to 4.2) 3.6 (3.3 to 3.9) 4.1 (3.7 to 4.5) 3.6 (3.0 to 4.4) 3.0 (2.6 to 3.4) 4.4 (4.1 to 4.6) 3.8 (3.3 to 4.3) 4.2 (3.7 to 4.6)
*

CI = confidence interval.

Includes Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities from a previous report that implemented CAD from 1998 to 2002.

Includes additional Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities that implemented CAD from 1998 to 2006.