Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;18(4):e202–e209. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i4.737

TABLE I.

Responses to items on the targeted peer reviewer questionnaire

Question Reviewer ratings [n (%)]
Lowest quality (1) (2) (3) (4) Highest quality (5)
Rate the guideline development methods. 4 (100)
Rate the guideline presentation. 4 (100)
Rate the guideline recommendations. 4 (100)
Rate the completeness of reporting. 4 (100)
Does this document provide sufficient information to inform your decisions? If not, what areas are missing? 4 (100)
Rate the overall quality of the guideline report. 4 (100)

Strongly disagree (1) (2) Neutral (3) (4) Strongly Agree (5)

I would make use of this guideline in my professional decisions. 4 (100)
I would recommend this guideline for use in practice. 4 (100)