Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr 17;85(3):461–467. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.012

Table 2.

Pearson or point-biserial correlations between study variables; internal consistency statistics (Cronbach’s alphas) are given on the diagonals in italics, where applicable.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Physician Prediction of
Patient Adherence
2 Patient Adherence 0.19* 0.70
3 Chronic Status of Patient −0.01 0.04
4 Patient Gender 0.11 0.00 0.03
5 Patient Age 0.05 0.03 0.26** −0.04
6 Patient Minority Status −0.23** 0.04 −0.01 0.09 −0.19**
7 Physician Perception of
Agreement
0.62** 0.19* −0.17** 0.05 −0.13* −0.18** 0.95
8 Patient Perception of
Agreement
0.15 0.19* −0.01 −0.02 −0.08 −0.17* 0.00 0.82
9 Degree to which Physician
Discussed Treatment
0.00 .25** −0.13 −0.14 −.18* .10 0.04 .37** 0.79

Note. Chronic Status of Patient is a dichotomous variable=0 if no chronic illness and =1 if 1 or more chronic illnesses; Patient gender is dichotomous with 1=female; Patient minority status is dichotomous with minority race=1 and Caucasian American race=0; all other variables are continuous with ranges presented in Table 1.

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).