. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1193–1209. doi: 10.1037/a0023100

Table 4.

Correlations and regressions multiple R² across talkers for physical measures and perceptual response categories. All but the last line of the table are correlations, and R² is given in the last line. Regression analyses were performed with the stepwise method using only physical measures whose correlation with the response category was significant, as indicated by bolding. The order in which physical measures were entered was based on the magnitude of the correlation (from highest to lowest). Matched audiovisual speech stimuli were excluded (N = 112).

	Response category
	Fusion	Combination	Auditory Correct	Visual Correct
LSP2O	−.21	.19	.20	−.23
LSP2OM	−.40^.10	.16	.14	.24
O2LSP	.09	−.20	−.02	.14
OM2LSP	−.17	.04	.18	−.06
PADR	.56^.32	−.47^.22	−.44^.02	.39^.15
minAP	−.49^.03	.24	.50^.25	−.30^.00
muinfoM	.08	−.13	.06	−.07
muinfo	.03	−.08	.01	.03
R²	.44	.22	.27	.15

Notes. Bolding indicates p < .05 (with Bonferroni correction), 2-tailed. Superscript indicates the multiple R² contributed by the corresponding physical measure.