Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1193–1209. doi: 10.1037/a0023100

Table 5.

Correlations and regression multiple R2 across talkers for physical measures and perceptual response categories. All but the last line of the table are correlations, and R2 is given in the last line. Regression analyses were performed with the stepwise method using only physical measures whose correlation with the response category was significant, as indicated by bolding. The order in which physical measures were entered was based on the magnitude of the correlation (from highest to lowest). Matched audiovisual speech stimuli were included (N = 128).

Response category
Fusion Combination Auditory
Correct		 Visual
Correct
LSP2O −.31.02 .09 .38.00 −.29.02
LSP2OM −.48.15 0 .43.02 .03
O2LSP −.20 −.23 .39.00 −.09
OM2LSP −.33.02 −.11 .49.24 −.20
PADR .55.31 −.45.20 −.40.15 .39.15
minAP −.34.03 .27 .24 −.21
muinfoM 0 −.16 .18 −.11
muinfo −.01 −.10 .08 0
R2 .52 .20 .41 .17

Notes. Bolding indicates p < .05 (with Bonferroni correction), 2-tailed. Superscript indicates the multiple R2 contributed by the corresponding physical measure.