Table 6.

Correlations for the individual talkers and a summary of the pattern of significant correlations. Matched audiovisual speech stimuli were included.

	Talker F2				Talker M1				Talker F1				Talker M2				Summary
	Response category				Response category				Response category				Response category				Response category
	Fus	Com	Aud	Vis	Fus	Com	Aud	Vis	Fus	Com	Aud	Vis	Fus	Com	Aud	Vis	Fus	Com	Aud	Vis
LSP2O	−.16	−.03	.254	−.06	−.373	.04	.644	−.57	−.393	.19	.344	−.29	−.373	.20	.374	−.22	−(3)	0	+(4)	0
LSP2OM	−.394	−.04	.414	.13	−.444	−.17	.484	.06	−.594	.03	.544	−.11	−.644	.10	.514	0	−(4)	0	+(4)	0
O2LSP	−.02	−.24	.314	−.05	−.17	−.24	.394	−.15	−.45	−.02	.524	−.32	−.18	−.38	.324	.03	0	0	+(4)	0
OM2LSP	−.19	−.18	.524	−.19	−.39	−.02	.404	−.05	−.43	−.17	.614	−.32	−.31	−.07	.494	−.29	0	0	+(4)	0
PADR	.634	−.554	−.294	.254	.524	−.424	−.534	.534	.624	−.404	−.474	.454	.464	−.504	−.364	.304	+(4)	−(4)	−(4)	+(4)
minAP	−.374	.563	.02	−.30	−.454	.423	.31	−.27	−.244	.07	.21	−.11	−.284	.333	.23	−.23	−(4)	+(3)	0	0
muinfoM	.08	−.16	.18	−.19	−.10	.28	.03	−.20	−.17	.01	.24	−.25	.27	−.18	−.11	−.05	0	0	0	0
muinfo	.05	.01	.04	−.18	−.22	.14	−.04	.27	−.06	−.20	.26	−.23	.08	−.12	−.07	.09	0	0	0	0

Notes. Bolding indicates p < .05 (with Bonferroni correction) across talkers, 2-tailed, N = 32. Superscripts indicate the number of talkers that produced supra-threshold correlations for each physical measure and response category pair. The thresholds for significant correlations were set at: one talker, .59; two talkers, .42; three talkers, .32; four talkers, .23. Fus = fusion; Com = combination; Aud = auditory correct; Vis = visual correct.