Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Dec 20;54(4):1101–1117. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0117)

Table 4. Number of baselines and counterbalanced order of category and typicality exposed in treatment. Also shown is a summary of acquisition (bench mark = 6.5) and generalization effect sizes (benchmark = 2.0) observed for each patient for trained items and untrained items.

Number of
baselines
Category
Trained
Trained
item
acquisition
ES-target
atypical
ES- other
atypical
Untrained item
generalization
ES- target
typical
ES- other
typical
P1 3 1. Things at
garage sale
Atypical 20.5 17.6 Typical 9.8 21.4
P2 4 1. Things to take
camping
Atypical 7.6 0.6 Typical 3.6 0.5
P3 3 1. Things at
garage sale
Atypical 11 4.6 Typical 10.4 4
P4 14 2. Things at
garage sale
Atypical 14.3 1.7 Typical 2.4 2.6
P6 3 1. Things at
garage sale
Atypical 10 8.1 Typical 2.6 1.7
Number of
baselines
Category
Trained
Trained
item
acquisition
ES-target
typical
ES- other
typical
Untrained item
generalization
ES- target
atypical
ES- other
atypical
P2 6 2. Things at
garage sale
Typical 1.9 −1 Atypical 3 0.1
P4 5 1. Things to take
camping
Typical 14.7 0* Atypical −0.05 0*
P5 3 1. Things to take
camping
Typical 6.06 1.2 Atypical 1.2 0.9
*

In these cases, effect sizes could not be calculated due the standard deviation in the baseline equaling zero.