Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2010 Oct;17(10):1217–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.007

Table 3.

Prevalence of latent class memberships of radiologists’ perceptions of CAD and double reading by radiologist characteristics

Radiologist Characteristic CAD Perception1 (row %) Double Reading Perception (row %)
Most Favorable Somewhat favorable Neutral or somewhat unfavorable Most Unfavorable Most Favorable Somewhat favorable Neutral or somewhat unfavorable Most Unfavorable
Total
35.8 43.3 12.0 9.0 64.5 28.2 5.1 2.3
Demographics
Sex
 Male 42.9 39.2 9.6 8.3 60.1 31.4 6.0 2.5
 Female 24.1 46.5 19.0 10.4 79.2 16.2 2.8 1.8
Age (yrs).
 <44 31.2 52.0 14.5 2.3 68.6 21.4 8.2 1.8
 45–54 40.4 32.5 14.3 12.8 58.2 34.1 3.6 4.1
 >=55
35.6 47.0 7.2 10.2 69.2 25.1 4.5 1.2
Practice Type
Primary Affiliation with Academic Medical Center
 No 35.8 43.2 10.6 10.4 59.4 32.1 6.2 2.3
 Adjunct 70.0 9.5 15.5 5.0 68.7 26.5 0.2 4.6
 Primary
16.7 53.9 24.2 5.2 98.0 1.7 0.2 0.1
Breast Imaging Experience
Fellowship training
 No 38.1 44.1 7.7 10.1 66.0 26.0 5.6 2.4
 Yes 18.3 39.5 41.7 0.5 60.9 38.8 0.2 0.1
Years of mammography interpretation
 <10 31.5 44.5 18.9 5.1 69.6 22.8 5.6 2.0
 10–19 46.5 33.9 8.0 11.6 60.6 32.0 4.7 2.7
 ≥20 32.6 46.3 11.6 9.5 65.5 28.2 4.2 2.1
Percent of time spent in breast imaging
 <20% 31.9 39.7 11.7 16.7 61.8 33.3 4.9 0.0
 20–39% 33.7 54.2 7.0 5.1 70.5 21.6 6.3 1.6
 40–79% 45.9 28.8 16.7 8.6 62.1 29.3 2.9 5.7
 80–100%
33.5 41.6 17.9 7.0 65.0 25.7 5.8 3.5
Volume
Self-reported average # of mammograms per year over the past 5 years
 <= 1000 37.7 34.3 17.2 10.8 70.1 23.5 3.1 3.3
 1001–2000 39.1 43.8 8.0 9.1 73.6 16.9 8.0 1.5
 >= 2000 37.9 40.5 13.9 7.7 65.8 28.1 3.3 2.8
Percent of workload that is screening
 <=10% 36.3 37.7 8.8 17.2 63.8 30.9 4.2 1.1
 11–24% 40.8 39.8 14.4 5.0 67.7 24.3 3.7 4.3
 >=25%
23.2 57.1 14.3 5.4 69.1 19.8 9.1 2.0
Interpretative Practice
CAD use for:
 screening - yes 59.9 21.5 10.0 8.6 64.4 27.7 5.6 2.3
 screening - no 12.2 71.7 13.8 2.3 64.7 31.6 3.7 0.0
 diagnostic - yes 53.3 24.8 11.3 10.6 62.1 32.2 4.1 1.6
 diagnostic - no 24.4 59.3 9.7 6.6 64.9 27.4 5.6 2.1
Double reader
 screening - yes 38.8 39.7 15.1 6.4 82.6 9.8 4.5 3.1
 screening - no 42.1 37.3 6.9 13.7 63.2 29.2 5.6 2.0
 diagnostic - yes 37.9 38.5 17.5 6.1 81.6 11.1 3.6 3.7
 diagnostic - no 38.0 42.7 8.4 10.9 65.3 27.9 4.8 2.0

Bold items are statistically significant covariates in the latent class model.