Table 3.
Multiple linear regressions showing the effects of lean and fat mass on HSA parameters with and without adjustment for sex
| Men & Women (n=134) | Women (n=56) | Men (n=78) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 2b | ||||
| β | P | β | P | β | P | |
| Section Modulus | ||||||
| Sex | −0.084 | 0.095 | ||||
| Lean mass | 0.025 | <0.001* | 0.014 | 0.532 | 0.029 | <0.001* |
| Fat mass | 0.002 | 0.593 | 0.009 | 0.031* | −0.004 | 0.431 |
| Cross Sectional Area | ||||||
| Sex | 0.011 | 0.876 | ||||
| Lean mass | 0.034 | <0.001* | 0.022 | 0.049* | 0.038 | <0.001* |
| Fat mass | 0.005 | 0.278 | 0.016 | 0.021* | −0.004 | 0.619 |
| Buckling ratio | ||||||
| Sex | −0.721 | 0.002* | ||||
| Lean mass | −0.043 | 0.021* | −0.023 | 0.492 | −0.050 | 0.030* |
| Fat mass | −0.012 | 0.432 | −0.019 | 0.059 | −0.010 | 0.673 |
P- value significant, ≤0.05
Adjusted for sex, hormone thrapy (HT)
Adjusted for HT, menopausal status (women only)