Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 21;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-29

Table 2.

Proportion variations in ownership of ITNs and untreated nets, in various social economic groups of study households

Social economic groups
Poorest Very poor Poor Less Poor Least Poor Conc. Index
1. Mpanda (N = 369)Over all
Proportion ownership % (N) [95% CI]
ITN (N = 322) 17.9%(66)[14.1-22.2] 17.1%(63)[13.4-21.3] 15.5%(57)[11.9-19.5] 18.7%(69)[14.9-23.10] 18.2%(67)[14.4-22.5] 0.0102
Untreated net (N = 47) 3.0%(11) [1.5-5.3] 2.2%(8) [0.9-4.2] 2.7%(10)[1.3-4.9] 1.6%(6)[0.6-3.5] 3.2%(12)[1.7-5.6] 0.0075
Any net (N = 369) 20.9%(77)[16.8-25] 19.2%(71)[15.3-23.6] 18.2%(67)[14.4-22.5] 20.3%(75)[16.3-24.8] 21.4%(79)[17.3-26.0] 0.0087

2.Kisarawe
Proportion ownership % (N) [95% CI]
ITN(N = 127) 8.7%(18)[5.2-13.4] 9.2%(19)[5.6-14.0] 12.6%(26)[8.4-17.9] 13.5%(28)[9.2-19.0] 17.4%(36)[12.5-23.4] 0.1318
Untreated Net(N = 80) 3.4%(7)[1.4-6.8] 3.4%(7)[1.4-6.8] 6.8%(14)[3.7-11.1] 8.2%(17)[4.9-12.8] 17.0%(36)[12.1-22.7] 0.303
Any net(=207) 12.1%[25)[8.0-17.3] 12.6%(26)[8.4-17.9] 19.3%(40)[14.2-25.4] 21.7%(45)[16.3-28.0] 34.3%(71)[27.9-41.2] 0.2033