Table 4.

Source of mosquito ITNs in various study households inMpanda and Kisarawe district by household economic status group

Source of Net	Socio economic groups
	Poorest	Very poor	Poor	Less Poor	Least Poor	Conc. Index
1. Mpanda (N = 369) overall	(N = 77)	(N = 71)	(N = 67)	(N = 75)	(N = 79)
Proportion %(N)[95% CI]
Free Nets	66.2%(51)[54.6-76.6]	78.9%56)[67.6-87.7]	61.2%(41)[48.5-72.9]	61.3%(46)[49.4-72.9]	46.8%(37)[35.5-58.4]	-0.064
Commercial	27.3%(21)[17.7-38.6]	19.7%(14)[11.2-30.9]	31.3%(21) [20.6-43.8]	25.3%(19)[16.0-36.7]	50.6%(40)[39.1-62.1]	0.156
Social Market	2.6%(2)[0.3-9.1]	0.00	4.5%(3) [0.9-12.5]	2.7%(2)[0.3-9.3]	2.5%(2)[0.3-8.8]	0.172
Other Source	3.9%(3)[0.8-11.0]	1.4%(1) [0.04-7.6]	2.9% (2) [0.4-10.4]	10.7%(8)[4.7-19.9]	0.00	0.04
2.Kisarawe (N = 207))overall	(N = 25)	(N = 26)	(N = 40)	(N = 45)	(N = 71)
Proportion %(N)[95% CI]
Free Nets	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Commercial	16.0%(4)[4.5-36.1]	42.3%(11)[23.4-63.1]	50.0%(20)[33.8-66.2]	51.1%(23)[35.8-66.3]	50.7%(36)[38.6-62.8]	0.269
Social Market	68.0%(17)[46.5-85.1]	46.2%(12)[26.6-66.6]	45.0%(18)[29.0-61.5]	28.9%(13)[16.4-44.3]	36.6%(26)[25.5-49.9]	0.003
Other Source	16.0%(4)[4.5-36.1]	11.5%(3)[2.4-30.2]	5.0%(2)[4.2-26.8]	20.0% (9)[8.0-32.1]	12.7%(9)[6.0-22.7]	0.179