Table 1.
Performance of CAMBa at various thresholds on the Rice and Wheat data sets
| Rice | Wheat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F(t) | Pred | Conf | FP | FN | Sens | Spec | F(t) | Pred | Conf | FP | FN | Sens | Spec |
| 0 | 308 | 11 | 233 | 0 | 100.00 | 98.71 | -10 | 310 | 37 | 208 | 5 | 95.33 | 95.44 |
| 1 | 131 | 11 | 56 | 0 | 100.00 | 99.69 | -5 | 172 | 36 | 73 | 8 | 92.52 | 98.40 |
| 2 | 75 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 90.67 | 99.96 | 0 | 107 | 36 | 8 | 8 | 92.52 | 99.82 |
| 3 | 54 | 10 | 0 | 21 | 72.00 | 100.00 | 5 | 92 | 33 | 1 | 16 | 85.05 | 99.98 |
| 4 | 46 | 9 | 0 | 29 | 61.33 | 100.00 | 10 | 81 | 31 | 0 | 26 | 75.70 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 40 | 7 | 0 | 35 | 53.33 | 100.00 | 15 | 59 | 21 | 1 | 49 | 54.21 | 99.98 |
Performance of CAMBa at various thresholds on the Rice (left) and Wheat data sets. F(t) = CAMBa threshold, Pred = # predicted mutations at that threshold, Conf = # of the predicted mutations which overlap with the confirmed mutations (11 in rice and 39 in wheat), FP = # false positives, FN = # false negatives, Sens = Sensitivity, Spec = Specificity. We underscore the line associated with the recommended number of predictions for both Rice and Wheat. We restrict our estimate of the number of False Positives to be at least 0.