Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 May 11;65(8):944–951. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.66

Table 3.

Second trimester intake of trans fatty acids in relation to risk of severe preeclampsia Danish National Birth Cohort, 1998–2003 (n = 67,186 pregnancies).

Quintile of Intake
1 2 3 4 5 p, trend 1
Industrial trans fats, range (g/day) < 0.25 0.25 – 0.37 0.38 – 0.51 0.52 – 0.72 ≥0.73
Cases / Pregnancies 71 / 13,437 98 / 13,437 71 / 13,438 85 / 13,437 77 / 13,437
Age and energy-adjusted RR 1.00 1.38 (1.02, 1.88) 1.01 (0.72, 1.40) 1.20 (0.88, 1.65) 1.09 (0.79, 1.51) 0.91
Multivariate-adjusted RR 2 1.00 1.43 (1.05, 1.95) 1.05 (0.75, 1.47) 1.29 (0.94, 1.79) 1.18 (0.85, 1.64) 0.69
Ruminant trans fats, range (g/day) < 1.06 1.06 – 1.33 1.34 – 1.62 1.63 – 1.99 ≥2.00
Cases / Pregnancies 84 / 13,437 91 / 13,437 88 / 13,438 71 / 13,437 68 / 13,437
Age and energy-adjusted RR 1.00 1.09 (0.81, 1.46) 1.05 (0.78, 1.41) 0.85 (0.62, 1.17) 0.82 (0.59, 1.12) 0.06
Multivariate-adjusted RR 2 1.00 1.14 (0.85, 1.54) 1.14 (0.84, 1.54) 0.98 (0.71, 1.35) 1.01 (0.73, 1.41) 0.75
Total trans fats, range (g/day) < 1.48 1.48 – 1.82 1.83 – 2.15 2.16 – 2.58 ≥2.59
Cases / Pregnancies 89 / 13,437 83 / 13,437 87 / 13,438 68 / 13,437 75 / 13,437
Age and energy-adjusted RR 1.00 0.93 (0.69, 1.25) 0.98 (0.73, 1.32) 0.77 (0.56, 1.05) 0.84 (0.62, 1.15) 0.15
Multivariate-adjusted RR 2 1.00 1.00 (0.74, 1.35) 1.11 (0.82, 1.50) 0.89 (0.64, 1.23) 1.07 (0.78, 1.48) 0.92
1

Calculated in a separate regression model where the median intake in each category was modeled as a continuous variable

2

Adjusted for age, total energy intake, pre-pregnancy BMI, height, parity, smoking status, education and year of pregnancy.