Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jul 1;45(15):6517–6523. doi: 10.1021/es200943z

Table 1.

Experimental results for the batch electrolysis experiments with different anodes and cathodes (current = 90 mA)

NO. Cathode Anode CA (mg L−1) (ini-fin) ζ (μS cm−1) (ini-fin) pH (ini-fin) Chloride (mg L−1) Cl mass recovery (%) FDEa (%) C mass recovery (%) (0.5h-fin)b K (×10−3 L h −1)
1 Copper foam Cast iron 39.9-<0.1 862-1368 7.7-11.3 32.7 80.2 >99.7c 90-25 212.5±3.8
2 Copper foam MMO 38.9-16.7 853-840 7.7-7.1 16.2 89.2 57.2 102-70 NA
3 Copper foam PbO2 40.0-16.5 853-911 7.6-6.9 11.7 74.3 61.0 104-71 NA

4 Copper plate Cast iron 38.6-4.3 845-970 7.6-10.1 30.5 80.3 88.8 90-23 64.6± 2.2
5 Pure iron plate Cast iron 39.7-7.1 850-866 7.5-9.7 19.6 72.1 82.1 89-33 54.4± 2.2
6 Iron foam Cast iron 40.2-1.7 863-950 7.7-10.1 19.5 57.7 95.6 94-20 90.1± 1.6
7 Nickle foam Cast iron 40.3-10.1 854-858 7.7-9.5 13.2 63.2 74.9 91-36 39.5± 1.6
8 Vitreous carbon foam Cast iron 40.4-7.1 855-1393 7.6-11.8 22.8 80.6 82.4 86-30 54.1± 3.7
a

FDE(Final degradation Efficiency)= (Ca(0)−Ca(5h)/Ca(0)) ×100%

b

Carbon mass recovery only considered the carbon mass contribution from the spiked TCE.

c

>99.7% means the concentration of aqueous TCE was below the detection limitation of the analytic method (0.1 mg L−1) after 5-hours electrolysis. 0.1 mg L−1 was used as final TCE concentration for FDE calculation. Same for other silimar expressions in this table.