Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(2-3):218–232. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.522840

TABLE 1.

A comparison of individuals receiving integrated versus nonintegrated HIV and opioid addiction treatment

Integrated treatment (n = 17) n (%)
Comparison group (n = 12) n (%)
Baseline 6 months Baseline 6 months
Baseline characteristics
 Age, mean years ± SD 48 ± 5 50 ± 5
 Male 12 (71) 7 (58)
 Race
  Hispanic 10 (59) 5 (42)
  Black 6 (35) 5 (42)
  Other 1 (6) 2 (16)
 Methadone treatment in past 3 months 5 (29) 9 (75)
Substance use outcomes (past 30 days)
 Heroin use 16 (94) 6 (35)* 12 (100) 8 (67)
 Cocaine use 9 (53) 4 (24)* 7 (58) 4 (33)
 Alcohol use 9 (53) 4 (24)* 2 (17) 0
 Injection drug use 11 (65) 3 (18)* 9 (75) 1 (8)*
HIV clinical outcomes
 Median CD4 count (cells/mm3) 348 371 182 140
 Median log HIV viral load 8.4 4.8 9.1 9.3
 Undetectable HIV viral load 3 (20) 7 (47) 1 (17) 0
 Had ≥ 1 log decrease in viral load 5 (29) 0
Health care utilization
 Visits, median 8 2**
 Had ≥ 2 CD4 counts conducted 9 (53) 1(8)***
Other outcomes
 Employed 3 (18) 2 (12) 0 2 (17)
 CESD > 16 11 (65) 13 (76) 5 (42) 5 (42)
 Good/very good/excellent health status 7 (41) 10 (59) 6(50) 6 (50)

Note: The sample size does not total 27 in every analysis because of some missing data points. CESD = Center for Epidemiologic Studies (Radloff, 1977).

*

p < .05 for within-group differences, using McNemar’s test.

**

p < .05 for between-group differences, using Wilcoxin U-test.

***

p < .05 for between-group differences, using Fischer’s exact test.