Table 3.
Odds ratios
| OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|
| Insertive anal sex (ISM) while under the influence of drugs or alcohol | ||
| Younger ISM partner pattern | 0.4 | (0.1, 3.3) |
| Same age ISM partner pattern | 2.0 | (1.0, 4.0)* |
| Slightly older ISM partner pattern | 0.9 | (0.4, 2.5) |
| Much older ISM partner pattern | 1.7 | (0.8, 3.8) |
| No ISM partner pattern | 3.0 | (1.3, 6.8)* |
| Receptive anal sex (RSM) while under the influence of drugs or alcohol | ||
| Younger RSM partner pattern | 1.3 | (0.1, 13.2) |
| Same age RSM partner pattern | 2.2 | (1.0, 4.6)* |
| Slightly older RSM partner pattern | 0.5 | (0.1, 2.1) |
| Much older RSM partner pattern | 2.7 | (1.2, 6.0)* |
| No RSM partner trend observed | 2.8 | (1.1, 7.0)* |
| Inconsistent condom use during insertive anal sex (ISM) | ||
| Younger ISM partner pattern | 1.2 | (0.2, 6.5) |
| Same age ISM partner pattern | 2.4 | (1.2, 4.9)* |
| Slightly older ISM partner pattern | 1.7 | (0.6, 4.3) |
| Much older ISM partner pattern | 1.7 | (0.7, 4.0) |
| No ISM partner pattern | 0.9 | (0.4, 2.4) |
| Inconsistent condom use during receptive anal sex (RSM) | ||
| Younger RSM partner pattern | 1.8 | (0.2, 17.6) |
| Same age RSM partner pattern | 2.0 | (0.9, 4.5) |
| Slightly older RSM partner pattern | 0.6 | (0.1, 2.9) |
| Much older RSM partner pattern | 1.9 | (0.8, 4.7) |
| No RSM partner trend observed | 3.1 | (1.2, 8.2)* |
*
p<.05