Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Mar 30;66(5):1312–1326. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22925

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison of standard deviation of the proton density weighted fat signal using the 6 options under study on the phantom data (for three different concentrations in Cu). The squares correspond to ESFA approach results, the stars correspond to ULFA approach results and the circles correspond to USFA approach results. The first row shows independent fieldmap estimation IDEAL results and second column shows joint fieldmap estimation IDEAL results.