Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul 30;94(4):1223–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.049

TABLE 3.

Multivariable unconditional logistic regression analyses of patients with disease-specific symptoms and with uterine weights >150 g.

Model 1: disease-specific symptoms
Model 2: uterine weight ≥150 g
Variable Adenomyosis
group (n = 70)
Leiomyoma
group (n = 142)
Results from multivariable analysis
Adenomyosis
group (n = 19)
Leiomyoma
group (n = 108)
Results from
multivariable analysis
P value OR (95% CI)a P value OR (95% CI)a
Age (y), mean (SD) 41.1 (6.2) 44.3 (4.9) .035 1.4 (1.02–1.9)b 43.8 (5.4) 45.1 (4.4) NS 0.9 (0.4–1.7)b
History of depression, n (%) 40 (57.1) 35 (24.7) <.001 3.3 (1.7–6.4) 10 (52.6) 24 (22.2) .024 3.8 (1.2–12.2)
History of endometriosis, n (%) 10 (14.3) 5 (3.5) NS 2.8 (0.8–10.1) 5 (26.3) 3 (2.8) .021 8.8 (1.4–56.1)
Dysmenorrhea, n (%) 46 (65.7) 60 (42.3) .044 2.0 (1.02–3.9) 10 (52.6) 42 (39.3) NS 1.0 (0.3–3.2)
Pelvic pain, n (%) 37 (52.9) 30 (21.1) .004 2.8 (1.4–5.6) 10 (52.6) 25 (23.2) NS 2.3 (0.7–7.6)
History of any surgical
 procedure, n (%)
43 (61.4) 67 (47.2) NS 1.4 (0.7–2.6) 9 (47.4) 55 (50.9) NS 0.7 (0.2–2.1)

Note:The sum of numbers for each type of variable exceeds the total number of patients because some patients had multiple conditions that apply.Abbreviations as in Table 2.

a

OR of adenomyosis group relative to odds of leiomyoma group.

b

OR per 5-year decrease in age.

Taran. Understanding adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2010.