Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug;11(8):1165–1171. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0164

Table 2.

Percent Blooding Success Compared to Feeding Position

 
Percent feeding in response to feeding position
Species Traditional glass membrane feeder Vertical Horizontal
Ae. aegypti 96 90 (−6)a 77 (−19)
Ae. albopictus 20 66 (+46) 52 (+32)
  76b 24 25
a

Percent difference in feeding success compared to control.

b

Percent difference in feeding between Ae. aegypti (control) and Ae. albopictus (handicap).