Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2010 Oct;72(5):1205–1219. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00759.x

Table 4.

Estimated Interaction Effects of Mother and Father Support/Strain by Gender on Marital Closeness/Strain From Growth-Curve Models

A. Mother (n = 520)
B. Father (n = 336)
Intercept Slope Intercept Slope
Marital closeness
 Parent support T1 0.267*** −0.010 0.156* 0.015*
 Parent strain T1 0.022 −0.005 0.030 −0.005
 Change in parent support T1 – T2 0.008 0.015
 Change in parent strain T1 – T2 0.001 −0.001
 Gender (1 = adult son) 0.369*** 0.009 0.445*** 0.013
 Parent support T1 × Adult son −0.065 0.013 0.036 0.002
 Parent strain T1 × Adult son −0.025 0.008 −0.007 0.009
 Change in parent support T1 – T2 × Adult son 0.002 0.006
 Change in parent strain T1 – T2 × Adult son −0.004 −0.003
 Mean 1.300** −0.060 3.058*** −0.108
 Random effects
  Level 2 variance 0.742*** 0.002*** 0.740*** 0.002***
  Level 1 variance 0.139*** 0.142***
 Log likelihood −1,539.577 −992.298
Marital strain
 Parent support T1 −0.090 0.011 −0.055 0.001
 Parent strain T1 0.149* −0.001 0.206* 0.011
 Change in parent support T1 – T2 0.001 −0.004
 Change in parent strain T1 – T2 0.008 0.010
 Gender (1 = adult son) −0.018 −0.008 0.043 −0.004
 Parent support T1 × Adult son −0.028 −0.006 0.006 0.000
 Parent strain T1 × Adult son −0.065 0.002 −0.066 −0.009
 Change in parent support T1 – T2 × Adult son 0.009 −0.007
 Change in parent strain T1 – T2 × Adult son −0.015 −0.006
 Mean −0.631 0.018 −1.844* 0.020
 Random effects
  Level 2 variance 0.965*** 0.004*** 0.970*** 0.003***
  Level 1 variance 0.103*** 0.088***
 Log likelihood −1,522.159 −937.625

Note: Age, gender, race, education, family income, marital duration, previously divorced, divorce hazard, parental status and only one living parent are controlled in all models.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .005.

***

p < .001 (two-tailed test).