Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Apr 24;210(4):453–469. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1848-1

Table 10.

Studies contributing effect size data for the meta-analysis of working memory-response time

Study Task/outcome H s g Standard error n Agea % male Smoking status Cigarettes per daya Nicotine dose Route of administration
Ernst et al. 2001a n-back 0.09 0.28 11 30 45 NSm NA 4 mg Buccal
Ernst et al. 2001b n-back 0.15 0.30 9 21–45 33 NSm NA 4 mg Buccal
Foulds et al. 1996b Digit recall 0.88 0.27 18 25 50 NSm NA 0.6 mg Subcutaneous
Heishman and Henningfield 2000b Digit recall 1.05 0.34 12 31 100 NSm NA 8 mg Buccal
Houlihan et al. 2001 Sternberg 0.83 0.25 20 26 60 Sm >20 1.1 mg Inhalation-cigarette
Jacobsen et al. 2006 n-back 0.00 0.25 14 NR NR NSm NA 3.5 or 7 mg Transdermal
Kleykamp et al. 2005b n-back 0.15 0.22 20 20 45 NSm NA 4 mg Buccal
Myers et al. 2008b n-back 0.16 0.19 28 36 50 Sm 22 2 mg Intranasal
Perkins et al. 2001b Sternberg 0.29 0.22 20 34 50 NSm NA 10–20 μg/kg Intranasal
Perkins et al. 2008b Sternberg 0.21 0.09 129 25 39 NSm NA 5–10 μg/kg Intranasal

Nsm nonsmoker, Sm smoker, NA not applicable, NR not reported

a

Mean value

b

Administered multiple active nicotine doses