Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov;31(11):E1811–E1824. doi: 10.1002/humu.21348

Supp. Table S1.

Compared distribution of each type of mutation in the LDLR gene between the French cohort and worldwide reports*

% in the French cohort (All probands) % in the French cohort (Unique events) % in worldwide reported unique events* p value **
Missense 47.7 46.0 47 0.793
Nonsense 17.8 11.3 9 0.143
Frameshift 11.8 14.6 19 0.053
In frame deletions, insertions or indels 2.7 3.8 4 0.743
Splice 11.2 13.6 8 0.002
5′ UTR 0.4 1.0 2 0.130
Major rearangements 8.5 9.7 11 0.491

N 1012 391 1066
*

Leigh et al.2008.

**

Chi2 test.