Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):327–340. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cd3aeb

Table 4.

Comparison of Pathologic Characteristics between Double-Hit Lymphoma Cases and Burkitt Lymphoma Controls

DHL
(n=20)
BL
(n=25)
p-value
Light chain expression*
 Absent (%)
 Kappa (%)
 Lambda (%)

5/18 (28)
3/18 (17)
10/18 (56)

2/13 (15)
6/13 (46)
5/13 (38)
NS
CD10 expression (%) 17/19 (89) 21/23 (91) NS
Bcl6 expression (%) 17/19 (89) 22/24 (92) NS
CD10 or Bcl6 expression (%) 20/20 (100) 24/24 (100) NS
Bcl2 expression (%) 18/18# (100) 1/24^ (4) <0.0001
Mum1 expression (%) 8/19 (42) 1/24 (4) 0.006
Ki-67 proliferation index <95% (%) 15/20 (75) 0/24 (0) <0.0001
EBER expression (%) 0/19 (0) 8/24** (33) 0.006
Complex karyotype (3 or more abnormalities) (%) 11/11 (100) 3/6 (50) 0.03
Median number of cytogenetic abnormalities
(range)
9 (5-20) 2.5 (2-6) 0.0009
MYC partner
IGH (%)
IGL (%)
 Unknown (%)

0/11 (0)
9/11 (82)
2/11 (18)

5/6 (83)
1/6 (17)
0/6 (0)
0.001
*

Surface light chain expression was determined by flow cytometry in all DHL and BL cases.

#

The single DHL case that was negative for Bcl2 expression with clone 124 but positive with clone C-2 (case 3) had a t(14;18) by karyotype.

^

The single Bcl2+ BL case showed no BCL2 rearrangement by FISH.

**

Among 8 EBER+ BL cases, 4 arose in HIV+ adults.

BL: Burkitt lymphoma, DHL: double-hit lymphoma, EBER: Epstein-Barr virus encoded RNA, IGH: immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, IGL: immunoglobulin lambda light chain gene.