Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 May 14;57(3):918–927. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.023

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Fig. displaying the LOO classification performance (80% average accuracy). (a) Abnormality score plotted against number of subjects when LOO cross validation is performed. The line shows the separability between populations (b) PDF of the LOO score plotted. This delineates the separation between two groups. (c) When the abnormality scores are divided into 3 groups (TD, ASD LI− and ASD LI+) the non-language impaired lie between the TD and LI+. The EMD for LI+ and TD was 0.86, while for LI+ and LI− it was 0.18 (d) ROC curve for the LOO classification with AUC of 0.81.