Abstract
Uncoupling protein 2 is a member of the mitochondrial anion carrier family that is widely expressed in neurons and the immune cells of humans. Deletion of Ucp2 gene in mice pre-activates the immune system leading to higher resistance toward infection and to an increased susceptibility to develop chronic inflammatory diseases as previously exemplified with the Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model for multiple sclerosis. Given that oxidative stress is enhanced in Ucp2−/− mice and that nitric oxide (NO) also plays a critical function in redox balance and in chronic inflammation, we generated mice deficient for both Ucp2 and iNos genes and submitted them to EAE. Mice lacking iNos gene exhibited the highest clinical score (3.4+/−0.5 p<0.05). Surprisingly, mice deficient for both genes developed milder disease with reduced immune cell infiltration, cytokines and ROS production as compared to iNos−/− mice.
Introduction
Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) induced in susceptible mice strains by active priming with a specific myelin epitope (MOG35–55) combined with microbial adjuvant. Pathology of EAE is primarily characterized by a chronic peripheral immune response in secondary lymphoïd tissue. Consequent infiltration of lymphocytes and mononuclear cells in the CNS leads to the autoimmune destruction of the myelin sheath in brain and in the spinal cord and to neuronal cell death. The clinical expression of extensive demyelization can be observed as weakness of tail, moderate forelimb paraplegia and severe paraplegia. Because the pathological and the clinical aspects of EAE share similarities with human multiple sclerosis, a disease affecting more than 2.5 million people worldwide, EAE has been widely used as model to study genetic and immunological parameters favoring the development of the disease. Animal models have revealed different immunological mechanisms of action triggering axonal and neuronal lesions in spinal cord and in central nervous system. Depending of the model, auto-antibodies, macrophages or microglia cytotoxic products, class I MHC restricted cytotoxic cells or class II MHC restricted Th1 or Th17 cells are involved in the development of neuroinflammation. All these mechanism are, to some extent, relevant to human multiple sclerosis diseases showing the complexity of the disease (for review see [1]). In other hand, genes controlling energy metabolism and oxidative stress have been proposed to contribute to MS susceptibility by regulating the immune system activity and neuronal fitness. The roles of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inflammation and in multiple sclerosis have been exemplified by several groups, suggesting that anti-oxidant therapies may re-enforce conventional immuno-therapies developed in the context of auto-immunity [2]. For instance, we have previously shown that mitochondrial Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) has a protective function during EAE [3]. Ucp2 mRNA is ubiquitous and the protein is readily detectable in tissues such as the spleen and lungs [4] and in immune cells like macrophages and T lymphocytes [5]. UCP2 has been shown to regulate ROS production in immune and in non-immune cells during pathological conditions such as atherosclerosis [6], type I diabetes [7], infections [5], cerebral ischemia [8] and EAE [3], thus protecting the organism from oxidative stress. Human genetic studies have confirmed these findings since the common G/A polymorphism at −866 upstream from Ucp2 promoter is linked to atherosclerosis, diabetes [9] and multiple sclerosis [10]. More recently, we established a general link between chronic inflammation and Ucp2 gene by showing that this common polymorphism contributes to eight other chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Wegener' granulomatosis, and psoriasis [11]. Several groups have suggested that UCP2 also plays a central role in the production of NO. Kizaki and colleagues showed that UCP2 expression in the macrophage cell line Raw264 induces a marked reduction of ROS and iNos gene expression upon lipopolysaccharides (LPS) treatment [12]. Conversely, immune challenge with LPS led to increased expression of iNOS protein and enhanced NO production in Ucp2 deficient mice [13]. Emre et al. have proposed that transient decreases of UCP2 expression at an early stage of inflammation increases mitochondrial ROS production, which in turn, activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway thus leading to iNOS protein expression and enhanced inflammation [14]. Production of NO is significantly increased in CNS lesions, MS patients' blood and urine but also in animals with EAE as revealed by paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis [15]. NO has long been considered as a potential contributor to EAE pathogenesis because highly reactive derivatives of NO such as peroxynitrites induce tissue damage and compromise the blood brain barrier permeability [16]. However, genetic deletion of iNos gene was associated with an increased susceptibility of mice to EAE suggesting an important down-regulatory role of NO on the immune system both in the periphery and target tissue [17], [18]. Indeed, NO can inhibit T lymphocyte proliferation and modulate the Th1/Th2 cytokines balance by favoring apoptosis or necrosis of autoreactive Th1 cells [19], [20]. Considering the dual effect of NO in EAE i.e., inhibition of autoreactive T cells and tissue damaging ability and the protective effect of UCP2 in EAE, we generated mice deficient for both genes and submitted them to EAE. Clinical scores and immune parameters demonstrated that (Ucp2-iNos) deficient mice developed a milder disease associated with decreased ROS production by macrophages.
Results
Clinical parameters after MOG immunization
As previously reported [3], Ucp2 deficient mice exhibited an increased score diseases during EAE. However, in this study, score diseases between Ucp2 deficient mice and control mice were not significantly different (Fig. 1), while in our previous study a significant difference was observed all over the induction phase. This is probably due to the reduced number of mice (18 instead of 40) used in this study (Table 1). Significant differences in disease severity between iNos deficient mice and the other genotypes were observed as from day 10. At days 13, 14 and 15, mean clinical scores were significantly increased in iNos deficient mice as compared to wild type mice (Fig. 1). Interestingly deletion of Ucp2 gene in iNos deficient mice significantly delayed the onset of the disease (p = 0.0003) and decreased the severity of the diseases observed in the iNos deficient mice at day 10, 13 and 14 (Fig. 1, Table 1). Other clinical parameters, i.e incidence of the disease, mortality, were not significantly affected (Table 1).
Table 1. Clinical parameters of the mice during Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.
N1 | Mean clinical score | Mean day of onset | Incidence | Mortality | |||
(%) | (%) | ||||||
Vogler et al. | Day 13 | Day 14 | Day 15 | ||||
Ucp2+/+ | 25 | 1.7±0.2 | 11.5±0.8 | 75 | |||
Ucp2−/− | 40 | 2.9±0.2 | 13.0±0.6 | 75 | |||
This study | Day 13 | Day 14 | Day 15 | ||||
Ucp2+/+ | 18 | 1.1±0.2 | 1.4±0.2 | 1.4±0.2 | 11.9±0.7 | 90 | 16.6 |
Ucp2−/− | 17 | 1.4±0.3 | 2.3±0.4 | 2.5±0.4 | 11.8±0.6 | 89.4 | 17.6 |
iNos−/− | 17 | 2.9±0.5 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.5±0.5 | 10.5±0.6 | 94.4 | 29.4 |
(Ucp2-iNos)−/− | 17 | 1.4±0.4 | 1.7±0.4 | 2.4±0.5 | 13.5±0.3 | 89.5 | 17.6 |
N = number of mice; Data represent means ± SEM.
Immune cell infiltration and cytokine production in the central nervous system upon EAE induction
To evaluate the loss of the BBB integrity and the consequent infiltration of activated immune cells, mRNA expression levels of monocytes/macrophages cell marker CD11b (Fig. 2A), and the T cell markers CD4 (Fig. 2B) and CD8 (Fig. 2C) were assayed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. At day 14 after immunization with the MOG peptide, the iNos deficient mice showed increased accumulation of CD11b mRNA (p<0.01 versus (Ucp2-iNos) deficient mice) and of CD4 mRNA (p< = 0.05 versus (Ucp2-iNos) deficient mice). No differences were observed in the accumulation of CD8 mRNA in the CNS of the different strains. Cytokines mRNA levels were measured in the inflamed CNS at day 14. The iNos deficient mice exhibited increased expression of the Th1 cytokines IFNγ (Fig. 3A), TNFα (Fig. 3B) and the Th2 cytokine IL-10 (Fig. 3D) when compared to Ucp2 deficient mice, and (Ucp2-iNos) deficient mice. Changes in Il-2 levels (Fig. 3D) were not statistically significant.
Oxidative stress analysis
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are key mediators that can regulate the intensity of an immune response. In order to assess the oxidative status of the immune system during EAE, we measured the ability of peritoneal exudates from MOG immunized Ucp2−/−, iNos−/− and (Ucp2-iNos) deficient mice to produce ROS in vitro 10 days after EAE induction (Fig. 4). In vitro stimulation with PMA generated increased production of ROS by iNos deficient macrophages compared to Ucp2 and (Ucp2-iNos) deficient macrophages. Oxidative stress in the brain and in the spinal cord of mice was also estimated by measuring the levels of GSH and GSSG. Levels of GSH and of GSSG were not significantly different between strains (data not shown) but GSSG content had a tendency to decrease in the CNS of (Ucp2- iNos) deficient mice (Fig. 5).
Discussion
We have shown that deletion of iNos gene induces a more severe disease than the deletion of Ucp2 gene. In addition, the inactivation of both Ucp2 and iNos genes is protective in EAE progression as demonstrated by delayed onset of the disease, reduced disease severity, decreased immune cell infiltration and cytokine production observed in (Ucp2-iNos) deficient mice.
Considering the above results and data available in literature, we propose the following scenario (Fig. 6). Activated T cells enter the CNS and they are reactivated by microglia to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFNγ and IL-2. Production of IFNγ by T cells within the CNS activates microglia and resident macrophages to produce TNFα, NO and ROS. Whereas TNFα allows recruitment of macrophages in the inflamed CNS, NO readily diffuses through the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes where it reversibly inhibits cellular respiration by competing with oxygen at the level of the cytochrome oxidase [23], thus triggering a reduced state of the respiratory chain that favors O2.- formation (Fig. 6). When NO is extensively produced, as is the case in Ucp2−/− macrophages [13], it may exert cytotoxic effects on complex I and II of the respiratory chain [24] and thus triggering ROS production by mitochondria and peroxynitrite formation as previously observed in atherosclerotic plaque of Ucp2−/− mice [6]. On the other hand, NO is also known to inhibit the NADPH oxidase [25], a major player in macrophage ROS production and an essential gene for the development of EAE since NADPH oxidase deficient mice are resistant to disease development [26]. NO also acts as a feedback loop to inhibit expansion of autoreactive T cells and therefore participate to the resolution of the inflammation (Fig. 6). In iNos deficient mice NO is no longer produced and this may therefore increase the infiltration and expansion of autoreactive CD4 cells. Interestingly, our study shows that inactivation of both Ucp2 and iNos genes leads to a less severe disease. The decreased ability of (Ucp2-iNos) deficient macrophages to produce ROS at an early stage of the disease (day 10) may represent the primary mechanism that confers protection to double knockout mice.
Despite the fact that UCP2 shares 60% homology with Uncoupling protein 1, a proton transporter that uncouples ATP synthesis from mitochondrial respiration in brown adipose tissue, UCP2 does not seem to ensure such an uncoupling activity in vivo [27]. Several studies [28]–[30] have shown that UCP2 is not a relevant proton transporter as UCP1 is, but rather an anion transporter. UCP2 protein has recently been proposed as pyruvate exporter that would transiently change the balance between glucose and free fatty acid oxidation, thus impacting ROS production and glucose sensing [31]. This “pyruvate hypothesis” can also impact the redox cytosolic state of the macrophage [32]. For instance, Nuebel et al. reported a decrease of the NADH/NAD+ ratio in bone marrow derived macrophages isolated from Ucp2−/− mice [28]. Moreover the citrate carrier, another member of the mitochondrial carrier family, has been proposed to play an anaplerotic function by regulating the cytosolic pool of NADPH. Indeed, by exporting citrate produced in the mitochondrial matrix to the cytosol, the citrate carrier provides substrate for the cytosolic NADP+ isocitrate dehydrogenase enzyme, which generates NADPH [33] that is used by the redox machinery including the NADPH oxidase, the iNOS synthase and the glutathione reductase enzymes. Therefore, the cell redox status results from the level of expression and activity of those enzymes and from the availability of their substrates (Fig. 6). This “NADPH hypothesis” need to be further explored in (Ucp2) deficient mice, because it could explain the decreases in ROS production by macrophages in (Ucp2-iNOS) deficient mice. Finally, our study illustrates the interplay between mitochondrial ROS and cytosolic NO productions in inflammation and highlights the importance of the mitochondrial metabolism in the redox state of immune cells.
Methods
Animals and induction of EAE
Studies on mice were performed in agreement with the institutional CNRS guidelines defined by the European Community guiding principles and by the French decree N°87/848 of October 19, 1987. Authorization to perform animal experiments was given by the French ministry of Agriculture, fisheries and food (A92580 issued February 2 1994 and 92–148 issued May 14, 2002). All protocols on mice were declared to the “Landesveterinär- und Lebensmitteluntersuchungsamt Mecklenburg
Vorpommern » gouvernement office and approved under the permit number No: LVL-MV 310-4/7221.3-1.1-024/2. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO). Double knock out animals were obtained by crossing Ucp2−/− and iNos−/− deficient mice on the EAE- susceptible C57BL/6 background. The (Ucp2−/−) mice have been previously described [21], [22]. The (iNos−/−) mice were obtained from the Jackson laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The F1 generation produced (Ucp2+/− iNos+/−) heterozygote mice. The F2 generation produced (Ucp2−/− iNos+/+) mice, (Ucp2+/+ iNos−/−) and (Ucp2−/− iNos−/−) mice. All mice were fed with sterile food and water ad libitum and kept in our animal facility at the Faculté de Médecine Necker in Paris. Inactivation of both genes was controlled by PCR analysis as previously described [17], [21]. EAE was induced in 7–10 weeks of age mice by subcutaneous injection with 150 µg of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG 35–55) peptide (Genosphere Biotechnologies, Paris, France) dissolved in 50 µl of distilled water and emulsified with an equal volume of incomplete Freund adjuvant complemented with 4 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). Mice also received an additional peritoneal injection of 400 ng of Pertussis toxin on day 0 and day 2. Clinical symptoms were scored as follows: 0, normal; 1, weak/flaccid tail; 2, waddle; 3, moderate paraparesis; 4, severe paraparesis; 5, tetraparesis; 6, moribund. The mean clinical score was determined as the average score of all animals for a given genotype at a given day. Mice showing no clinical symptoms at all were excluded from the analysis.
ROS production by peritoneal macrophages
Peritoneal macrophages were obtained from diseased animals at days 10, 14 and 30 after EAE induction. They were subsequently washed twice in 10 ml ice-cold PBS. Red blood cells were lysed with a 0.83% NH4CI Tris-Buffered solution. Remaining cells were then counted and cultured in 96 well plates at a density of 105 cells per well and allowed to adhere for 2 hours at 37°C. Non adherent cells were eliminated by washing the plates twice with PBS. Adherent macrophages were stimulated with 500 ng/ml PMA in 100 µL of 1 mg/ml NBT dissolved in RPMI 1640. After one-hour stimulation, the plates were centrifuged and supernatant was discarded. The formazan precipitate was washed and dissolved with an equal volume of DMSO and 2 M KOH solution as previously described [21]. Absorbance was read at 630 nm.
Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR
To evaluate cytokine expression and immune cells infiltration, both spinal cord and brain were collected from diseased mice at days 10 and 14 after EAE induction. The tissues were individually grinded in phosphate buffer using a nylon mesh to separate cells. The suspension was centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes and the resulting cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml TRIzol (Invitrogene, Carlsbad, CA) for RNA isolation according to manufacturer's instructions. First strands of cDNA were synthesized from 1 µg total RNA by using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and then subjected to PCR using specific primers in a Bio-Rad iCycler iQ real-time detection system. Data were calculated on the basis of threshold cycle (CT) for the target gene and the reference gene GADPH according to the following formula: 2 Δ(CT(GADPH) - CT(Target)). Oligonucleotide sequences used were IL-4 forward 5′-GGT CTC AAC CCC CAG CTA GT-3′; IL-4 reverse 5′-GCC GAT GAT CTC TCT CAA GTG AT-3′; IL10 forward 5′-CTG GAC AAC ATA CTG CTA ACC G-3′; IL-10 reverse 5′-GGG CATC ACT TCT ACC AGG TAA-3′; TNFα forward 5′-CCC TCA CAC TCA GAT CAT CTT CT-3′; TNFα reverse 5′-GCT ACG ACG TGG GCT ACA G-3′; IFN γ forward 5′-GAA CTG GCA AAA GGA TGG TGA-3′; IFNγ reverse 5′-TGT GGG TTG TTG ACC TCA AAC-3′; CD4 forward 5′-TCA CCT GGA AGT TCT CTG ACC-3′; CD4 reverse 5′-GGA ATC AAA ACG ATC AAA CTG CG-3′; CD8 forward 5′-CAT CCT GCT TCT GCT GGC ATT-3′; CD8 reverse 5′-TGG GCG CTG ATC ATT TGT GAA A-3′; CD11b forward 5′- ATG GAC GCT GAT GGC AAT ACC-3′; CD11b reverse 5′-TCC CCA TTC ACG TCT CCC A-3′; GAPDH forward 5′-TGA CCA CAG TCC ATG CCA TC-3′; GADPH reverse 5′- GAC GGA CAC ATT GGG GGT AG-3′.
Determination of oxidative stress in CNS
Fresh brain and spinal cord tissues were collected from diseased animals (day 14) and minced in TES buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 250 mM sucrose). Thirty microliters of the resulting homogenate was sonified for 30 seconds. Ten microliters of 10% metaphosphoric acid and 170 µl of 10 mM NaH2PO4, pH 2.7 were subsequently added to each sample, thoroughly mixed and allowed to incubate on ice for 10 minutes for deproteinisation. After incubation, samples were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 15 000 g and supernatant was kept on ice until analysis. Reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were simultaneously determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Separation was performed on an Uptisphere column (ODB 250×4.6 mm, 5 µm; Interchim, Montluçon, France) using a mobile phase containing 10 mM NaH2PO4, 1.25% methanol, pH 2.7. Analytical cell potentials were set at 400 mV for E1 and 900 mV for E2. The retention times of GSH and GSSG were 5.4 and 12.6 min, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Evaluation of statistical differences between genotypes was determined by Anova and Bonferroni's multiple comparaison test. In all cases, P<0.05 were considered significant.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Fréderic Bouillaud for stimulating discussions and Céline Roule and Ilona Klamfuss for animal care.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), by grants from The Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01ZZ0108 to S.M.I.) and from l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR JCJC Ucp2 to BM). Caroline Aheng received a PhD fellowship from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur and from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT20090916769). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Lassmann H. Axonal and neuronal pathology in multiple sclerosis: what have we learnt from animal models. Exp Neurol. 2010;225:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.10.009. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gilgun-Sherki Y, Melamed E, Offen D. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: the need for effective antioxidant therapy. J Neurol. 2004;251:261–268. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0348-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0348-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vogler S, Pahnke J, Rousset S, Ricquier D, Moch H, et al. Uncoupling protein 2 has protective function during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:1570–1575. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pecqueur C, Alves-Guerra MC, Gelly C, Levi-Meyrueis C, Couplan E, et al. Uncoupling protein 2, in vivo distribution, induction upon oxidative stress, and evidence for translational regulation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:8705–8712. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006938200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006938200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rousset S, Emre Y, Join-Lambert O, Hurtaud C, Ricquier D, et al. The uncoupling protein 2 modulates the cytokine balance in innate immunity. Cytokine. 2006;35:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2006.07.012. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blanc J, Alves-Guerra MC, Esposito B, Rousset S, Gourdy P, et al. Protective role of uncoupling protein 2 in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2003;107:388–390. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000051722.66074.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Emre Y, Hurtaud C, Karaca M, Nubel T, Zavala F, et al. Role of uncoupling protein UCP2 in cell-mediated immunity: how macrophage-mediated insulitis is accelerated in a model of autoimmune diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19085–19090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709557104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709557104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mattiasson G, Shamloo M, Gido G, Mathi K, Tomasevic G, et al. Uncoupling protein-2 prevents neuronal death and diminishes brain dysfunction after stroke and brain trauma. Nat Med. 2003;9:1062–1068. doi: 10.1038/nm903. doi: 10.1038/nm903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fleury C, Neverova M, Collins S, Raimbault S, Champigny O, et al. Uncoupling protein-2: a novel gene linked to obesity and hyperinsulinemia. Nat Genet. 1997;15:269–272. doi: 10.1038/ng0397-269. doi: 10.1038/ng0397-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vogler S, Goedde R, Miterski B, Gold R, Kroner A, et al. Association of a common polymorphism in the promoter of UCP2 with susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. J Mol Med. 2005;83:806–811. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0661-5. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0661-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu X, Wieczorek S, Franke A, Yin H, Pierer M, et al. Association of UCP2 -866 G/A polymorphism with chronic inflammatory diseases. Genes Immun. 2009;10:601–605. doi: 10.1038/gene.2009.29. doi: 10.1038/gene.2009.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kizaki T, Suzuki K, Hitomi Y, Taniguchi N, Saitoh D, et al. Uncoupling protein 2 plays an important role in nitric oxide production of lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:9392–9397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142206299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142206299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bai Y, Onuma H, Bai X, Medvedev AV, Misukonis M, et al. Persistent nuclear factor-kappa B activation in Ucp2−/− mice leads to enhanced nitric oxide and inflammatory cytokine production. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:19062–19069. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500566200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500566200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Emre Y, Hurtaud C, Nübel T, Criscuolo F, Ricquier D, et al. Mitochondria contribute to LPS-induced MAPK activation via uncoupling protein UCP2 in macrophages. Biochem J. 2007;402:271–278. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061430. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin RF, Lin TS, Tilton RG, Cross AH. Nitric oxide localized to spinal cords of mice with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: an electron paramagnetic resonance study. J Exp Med. 1993;178:643–648. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.2.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kean RB, Spitsin SV, Mikheeva T, Scott GS, Hooper DC. The peroxynitrite scavenger uric acid prevents inflammatory cell invasion into the central nervous system in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis through maintenance of blood-central nervous system barrier integrity. J Immunol. 2000;165:6511–6518. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.11.6511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fenyk-Melody JE, Garrison AE, Brunnert SR, Weidner JR, Shen F, et al. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is exacerbated in mice lacking the NOS2 gene. J Immunol. 1998;160:2940–2946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sahrbacher UC, Lechner F, Eugster HP, Frei K, Lassmann H, et al. Mice with an inactivation of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene are susceptible to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:1332–1338. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199804)28:04<1332::AID-IMMU1332>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duhé RJ, Evans GA, Erwin RA, Kirken RA, Cox GW, et al. Nitric oxide and thiol redox regulation of Janus kinase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:126–131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nicotera P, Brune B, Bagetta G. Nitric oxide: inducer or suppressor of apoptosis? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997;18:189–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arsenijevic D, Onuma H, Pecqueur C, Raimbault S, Manning BS, et al. Disruption of the uncoupling protein-2 gene in mice reveals a role in immunity and reactive oxygen species production. Nat Genet. 2000;26:435–439. doi: 10.1038/82565. doi: 10.1038/82565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alves-Guerra M, Rousset S, Pecqueur C, Mallat Z, Blanc J, et al. Bone marrow transplantation reveals the in vivo expression of the mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 in immune and nonimmune cells during inflammation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:42307–42312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306951200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306951200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jekabsone A, Neher JJ, Borutaite V, Brown GC. Nitric oxide from neuronal nitric oxide synthase sensitises neurons to hypoxia-induced death via competitive inhibition of cytochrome oxidase. J Neurochem. 2007;103:346–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04765.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nathan C. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J. 1992;6:3051–3064. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Clancy RM, Leszczynska-Piziak J, Abramson SB. Nitric oxide, an endothelial cell relaxation factor, inhibits neutrophil superoxide anion production via a direct action on the NADPH oxidase. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1116–1121. doi: 10.1172/JCI115929. doi: 10.1172/JCI115929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van der Veen RC, Dietlin TA, Hofman FM, Pen L, Segal BH, et al. Superoxide prevents nitric oxide-mediated suppression of helper T lymphocytes: decreased autoimmune encephalomyelitis in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase knockout mice. J Immunol. 2000;164:5177–5183. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.10.5177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Couplan E, del Mar Gonzalez-Barroso M, Alves-Guerra MC, Ricquier D, Goubern M, et al. No evidence for a basal, retinoic, or superoxide-induced uncoupling activity of the uncoupling protein 2 present in spleen or lung mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:26268–26275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202535200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202535200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nübel T, Emre Y, Rabier D, Chadefaux B, Ricquier D, et al. Modified glutamine catabolism in macrophages of Ucp2 knock-out mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1777:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.11.002. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pecqueur C, Alves-Guerra C, Ricquier D, Bouillaud F. UCP2, a metabolic sensor coupling glucose oxidation to mitochondrial metabolism? IUBMB Life. 2009;61:762–767. doi: 10.1002/iub.188. doi: 10.1002/iub.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mozo J, Ferry G, Studeny A, Pecqueur C, Rodriguez M, et al. Expression of UCP3 in CHO cells does not cause uncoupling, but controls mitochondrial activity in the presence of glucose. Biochem J. 2006;393:431–439. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050494. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bouillaud F. UCP2, not a physiologically relevant uncoupler but a glucose sparing switch impacting ROS production and glucose sensing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1787:377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.01.003. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dumollard R, Carroll J, Duchen M, Campbell K, Swann K. Mitochondrial function and redox state in mammalian embryos. SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY. 2009;20:346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.013. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dumollard R, Ward Z, Carroll J, Duchen M. Regulation of redox metabolism in the mouse oocyte and embryo. DEVELOPMENT. 2007;134:455–465. doi: 10.1242/dev.02744. doi: 10.1242/dev.02744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]