Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 May 7;38(9):1723–1731. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1831-z

Table 4.

Patients with the final diagnosis not being HCC

Patient
ID		 Age,
years		 Sex Interpretation of
FDGal PET images		 Interpretation of
ceCT images		 Final diagnosis
11 51 F No lesions Three lesions No cancer
16 55 F No lesions One suspicious lesion No cancer
25 54 M No lesions One suspicious lesion Pancreatic cancer
26 57 M No lesions One suspicious lesion No cancer
31 48 F No lesions US: lymph node in porta hepatis No cancer
38 45 F No lesions One suspicious lesion
US: one suspicious lesion		 Haemangioma
40 43 F No lesions ceCT+MRI+US: one suspicious lesion Adenoma

FDGal, 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose; ceCT, contrast-enhanced CT; F, female; M, male; US, ultrasound sonography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.