Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2011 Jun 23;18(9):1123–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.04.012

Table 1.

Comparison of lesion volume measured by MRI and visible macroscopic imaging with 4 s of HIFU exposure. It is noted that at the concentration of 106 droplets/mL, copious ADV bubbles were observed, but no lesions were detected by either visible, macroscopic imaging or MRI, possibly due to the backscatter from the high-density ADV bubbles advancing the droplet vaporization proximally to shadow the focus.

Droplet concentration (/mL) MRI volume (cm3) Optical volume (cm3)
0 (n=8) 0.05 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01
104 (n=5) 0.10 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.02
105 (n=8) 0.29 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.05
106 (n = 8) No lesion No lesion