Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun;14(5):537–544. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0821

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Sample and Bivariate Analysis (X2 Test) of complementary and Alternative Medicine Utilization in Depressed Patients in Primary Care Settings (n = 415)

 
 
Complementary and alternative medicine utilization
Independent variables Total N (%) Never/rarely N (%) Moderate N (%) Frequent N (%) p-value
Age         0.657
 <45 119 (29) 57 (48) 27 (23) 35 (29)  
 45–49 211 (51) 83 (39) 54 (26) 74 (35)  
 ≥60 85 (21) 38 (45) 20 (34) 27 (32)  
Gender         0.038
 Male 94 (23) 33 (35) 32 (34) 29 (31)  
 Female 321 (77) 145 (45) 69 (22) 107 (33)  
Ethnicity         0.033
 Hispanic 276 (66) 133 (48) 62 (23) 81 (29)  
 African Americans 85 (21) 25 (29) 24 (28) 36 (42)  
 Others 54 (13) 20 (37) 15 (28) 19 (35)  
Education         0.172
 <6th grade 163 (41) 79 (49) 32 (20) 52 (32)  
 9th–11th grade 64 (16) 26 (41) 20 (31) 18 (28)  
 High school diploma 81 (20) 33 (41) 19 (24) 29 (36)  
 College 93 (23) 30 (32) 28 (30) 35 (38)  
Medical care coverage         0.001
 No 218 (53) 111 (51) 51 (26) 79 (40)  
 Yes 197 (47) 67 (34) 50 (23) 57 (26)  
Self-rated health status         0.040
 Excellent–Good 83 (20) 35 (42) 13 (16) 35 (42)  
 Fair-Poor 332 (80) 143 (43) 88 (27) 101 (30)  
Self-reported functional impairment         0.845
 No impairment 119 (29) 53 (45) 27 (23) 39 (33)  
 With impairment 296 (71) 125 (42) 74 (25) 97 (33)  
Clinical depression diagnosis         0.500
 No 293 (70) 128 (44) 74 (25) 91 (31)  
 Yes 122 (30) 50 (41) 27 (22) 45 (45)  
Rx used for depression         0.261
 No 299 (72) 132 (44) 76 (25) 91 (30)  
 Yes 116 (28) 46 (40) 25 (22) 45 (39)  
Depression severity (PHQ-9)         0.012
 Mild (PHQ < 10) 98 (24) 43 (44) 26 (27) 29 (30)  
 Moderate (PHQ 10–14) 103 (25) 35 (34) 22 (21) 46 (45)  
 Moderately severe (PHQ 15–19) 131 (32) 70 (53) 25 (19) 36 (28)  
 Severe (PHQ ≥20) 81 (20) 28 (35) 28 (35) 25 (31)  

PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire.