Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 26;25(9):2006–2015. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.96

Table 3.

Endocortical Bone-Formation Indices From Mice Subjected to Axial Tibial Compression (Mean ± SD)

7 Months 22 Months


8 N 10 N 12 N 8 N 10 N 12 N






Outcome Control (n = 11) Loaded (n = 12) Control (n = 13) Loaded (n = 12) Control (n = 7) Loaded (n = 8) Control (n =11) Loaded (n = 10) Control (n = 8) Loaded (n = 9) Control (n = 9) Loaded (n = 9)
Ec.sLS/BS (%) 28.9 ± 9.7 29.0 ± 11.1 25.4 ± 8.0 31.8a ± 9.2 29.2 ± 6.9 39.0 ± 23.6 34.8 ± 12.4 50.4d ± 15.1 33.0 ± 12.8 48.8a,d ± 13.2 39.3d ± 7.7 46.2 ± 18.1
Ec.dLS/BS (%) 0.1 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 1.9 0.2 ± 0.6 1.0 ± 1.7 0.0 ± 0.0 4.5a,b,c ± 4.2 0.2 ± 0.5 4.4a,d ± 4.4 0.1 ± 0.2 13.9 a,b,d ± 11.1 0.0 ± 0.0 17.3a,b,d ± 14.7
Ec.MS/BS (%) 14.2 ± 5.6 15.4 ± 5.9 12.9 ± 3.8 16.9a ± 5.6 14.6 ± 3.4 24.0 a,b,c ±10.7 17.6 ± 6.2 29.6a,d ± 9.2 16.6 ± 6.6 38.2a,d ± 12.3 19.7d ± 3.9 40.4a,d ± 15.4
Ec.MAR (µm/day) 0.75 (n = 1) 1.29 ± 0.33 (n = 4) 1.63 (n = 1) 1.41 ± 0.64 (n = 5) ND 1.42 ± 0.60 (n = 6) 1.13 (n = 2) 1.52 ± 0.36 (n = 8) 1.03 (n = 1) 1.71 ± 0.52 (n = 9) ND 1.92 ± 0.52 (n = 9)
Ec.BFR/BS (µm/day) 0.13 (n = 1) 0.22 ± 0.03 (n = 4) 0.21 (n = 1) 0.30 ± 0.11 (n = 5) ND 0.32 ± 0.21 (n = 6) 0.27 (n = 2) 0.49 ± 0.25 (n = 8) 0.26 (n = 1) 0.70d ± 0.33 (n = 9) ND 0.82d ± 0.44 (n = 9)
a

Loaded (right) different from control (nonloaded, left); p < .05, paired t test.

b

Different from 8-N group of same age.

c

Different from 10-N group of same age; p < .05, ANOVA.

d

Different from 7-month-old group at same force level; p < .05, ANOVA.

ND = no detectable double label; owingue to the low incidence of double labels in control tibias, statistical comparisons of MAR and BFR between loaded and control bones were not performed.