Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Oct;39(7):953–966. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9516-4

Table 2.

Summary of Multiple Regression Analyses for the Moderated Mediation Models

Variable Social Withdrawal
Age 5 Protective Behavior
b (SE) 95% CI β t b (SE) 95% CI β t
Path A
 Fearful temperament 0.01 (0.02) −0.04, 0.06 0.02 0.26 0.01 (0.02) −0.04, 0.05 0.02 0.22
 Maternal accuracy 5.02 (0.94) 3.16, 6.88 0.50 5.36** 5.05 (0.94) 3.19, 6.91 0.50 5.40***
 Fearful temperament X accuracy 2.21 (0.81) 0.60, 3.81 0.25 2.73** 2.21 (0.81) 0.60, 3.81 0.25 2.74**
Paths C, C′, and B
Step 1 (Path C)
 Fearful temperament 1.39 (0.35) 0.70, 2.08 0.39 3.99** 0.05 (0.04) −0.03, 0.14 0.12 1.23
Step 2 (Path C′ and B)
 Fearful temperament 1.00 (0.37) 0.27, 1.72 0.28 2.73** 0.03 (0.05) −0.06, 0.12 0.08 0.71
 Maternal accuracy 11.50 (16.15) −20.60, 43.59 0.08 0.71 −2.91 (2.01) −6.90, 1.09 −0.18 −1.45
 Fearful temperament X accuracy −8.72 (12.59) −33.73, 16.30 −0.07 −0.69 −0.15 (1.56) −3.26, 2.95 −0.01 −0.10
 Age 2 protective behavior 4.89 (1.60) 1.72, 8.07 0.35 3.06** 0.65 (0.20) 0.25, 1.04 0.40 3.26**

Note. Naming of paths coincides with traditional mediation terminology (Baron & Kenny, 1986). CI = confidence interval for the unstandardized beta estimates. In the Social Withdrawal model, maternal BIS sensitivity was included as a covariate in all steps. In the Age 5 Protective Behavior model, both maternal BIS sensitivity and SES were included as covariates in all steps.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.