Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 18;1:174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174

Table 4.

Reaction times (in ms) to singular Dutch nouns as a function of the frequencies of the plurals and the family size, as reported by Schreuder and Baayen (1997) and in virtual DLP experiments.

Original experiments RTs Virtual experiments RTs Number of stimuli in virtual experiments (original number of stimuli per condition)
Exp. 1: high vs. low-frequency plurals 539 vs. 580** 583 vs. 631** 35 vs. 34 (35)
Exp. 2: high vs. low cumulative family frequency 599 vs. 644** 606 vs. 665** 27 vs. 27 (32)
Exp. 3: high vs. low family size 553 vs. 594* 599 vs. 646* 18 vs. 16 (18)
Exp. 4: high vs. low cumulative frequency for fixed family size 598 vs. 612 666 vs. 664 16 vs. 11 (17)
Exp. 5: high vs. low singular for fixed family size and cumulative frequency 576 vs. 656** 625 vs. 709** 18 vs. 9 (20)

For original experiments: **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 in both F1 and F2 analysis.

For virtual experiments: **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 in mixed effects analysis including random intercepts for participants and stimuli.