Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 5;5:70. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00070

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals of the EEG-based present performance model after grouping the observed and estimated F-Measure into classes of unacceptable (F-Measure < 0.80) and acceptable (F-Measure ≥ 0.80) performance.

Quartile Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
MODEL DEVELOPMENT
1 0.85 (0.76–0.95) 0.92 (0.89–0.95) 0.64 (0.53–0.74) 0.98 (0.96–0.99)
2 0.82 (0.75–0.89) 0.87 (0.83–0.91) 0.70 (0.62–0.78) 0.93 (0.90–0.96)
3 0.83 (0.77–0.88) 0.74 (0.69–0.80) 0.73 (0.67–0.79) 0.83 (0.78–0.89)
4 0.83 (0.78–0.88) 0.64 (0.57–0.71) 0.70 (0.64–0.76) 0.78 (0.72–0.85)
CROSS-VALIDATION
1 0.78 (0.67–0.89) 0.90 (0.87–0.94) 0.57 (0.45–0.68) 0.96 (0.94–0.98)
2 0.80 (0.73–0.88) 0.86 (0.82–0.90) 0.68 (0.60–0.76) 0.92 (0.89–0.95)
3 0.78 (0.72–0.84) 0.70 (0.63–0.76) 0.68 (0.62–0.75) 0.79 (0.73–0.85)
4 0.81 (0.75–0.86) 0.61 (0.54–0.68) 0.68 (0.62–0.74) 0.75 (0.69–0.82)