Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Surv Res Methods. 2009 Jan 1;3(3):123–137.

Table 2.

Estimated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for interactions

Predictor Odds Ratio
Sex, Respondent Type (Reference Group: Female and Male, Self)
Male, Proxy 1.23* (1.20, 1.27)
Age, Respondent Type (Reference Group: Self and 65+, Proxy)
18-24, Proxy 0.71* (0.66, 0.75)
25-44, Proxy 0.97 (0.92, 1.02)
45-64, Proxy 0.98 (0.93, 1.03)
Education, Respondent Type (Reference Group: Self and 16+, Proxy)
< 12 years, Proxy 0.97 (0.92, 1.03)
12 years, Proxy 1.07* (1.02, 1.12)
13-15 years, Proxy 0.92* (0.88, 0.96)
Survey Year, Survey Mode (Reference Group: In-Person and 2003, Telephone)
1992-93, Telephone 0.90* (0.86, 0.94)
1995-96, Telephone 0.95 (0.91, 1.00)
1998-99, Telephone 0.92* (0.88, 0.96)
2001-02, Telephone 0.96 (0.91, 1.00)
Sex, Survey Mode (Reference Group: Female and Male, In-Person)
Male, Telephone 0.92* (0.90, 0.94)
Age, Survey Mode (Reference Group: In-Person and 65+, Telephone)
18-24, Telephone 0.86* (0.81, 0.91)
25-44, Telephone 0.90* (0.86. 0.93)
45-64, Telephone 0.92* (0.87, 0.96)

Note: Results are based on logistic regression. Reference groups for interactions are determined based on the reference groups for the main effects presented in Table 2;

*

Indicates a statistically significant result when compared to the reference group at 5% significance level.