Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 10;6(8):e22075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022075

Table 5. Results concerning the ten most probable models in the breast cancer study in [1].

SNP prior = 0.00001 prior = 0.0001 prior = 0.01 prior = 0.1 p-value Šidák previous BC association
rs10510126 0.0118 0.1185 0.9967 0.9992 Inline graphic 0.7307 No
rs17157903 0.0031 0.0306 0.9693 0.9968 Inline graphic 0.9919 Yes
rs2420946 (FGFR2) 0.0022 0.0218 0.9570 0.9955 Inline graphic 0.9997 Yes
rs1219648 (FGFR2) 0.0021 0.0209 0.9552 0.9953 Inline graphic 0.9986 Yes
rs7696175 0.0013 0.0131 0.9298 0.9925 Inline graphic 0.9997 Yes
rs197275 0.0012 0.0123 0.9256 0.9920 Not Avl. Not Avl. No
rs12505080 0.0012 0.0123 0.9255 0.9920 Inline graphic 0.9881 No
rs210739 0.0011 0.0114 0.9204 0.9914 Not Avl. Not Avl. Yes
rs10779967 0.0011 0.0113 0.9194 0.9913 Not Avl. Not Avl. No
rs2981579 (FGFR2) 0.0008 0.0083 0.8933 0.9882 Not Avl. Not Avl. Yes

Columns 2–5 show posterior probabilities for various priors, while Columns 6 and 7 shows p-values (obtained from [1]) and Sidák-corrected p-values.