TABLE 2.
Facility A Abstinence |
Facility B Abstinence |
Facility C Abstinence |
|||||||
Yes | No | Total | Yes | No | Total | Yes | No | Total | |
Marginal continuing care PM and abstinence distributions | |||||||||
Continuing care PM, % | |||||||||
Yes | … | … | 33 | … | … | 52 | … | … | 72 |
No | … | … | 67 | … | … | 48 | … | … | 28 |
Total | 25 | 75 | 100 | 25 | 75 | 100 | 25 | 75 | 100 |
Marginal and within-facility continuing care PM and abstinence joint distributions (relationships) | |||||||||
Continuing care PM, No. | |||||||||
Yes | 26 | 40 | 66 | 36 | 68 | 104 | 44 | 100 | 144 |
No | 24 | 110 | 134 | 14 | 82 | 96 | 6 | 50 | 56 |
Total | 50 | 150 | 200 | 50 | 150 | 200 | 50 | 150 | 200 |
Note. PM = performance measure. The ellipses indicate patient-level data within programs that are either not available (if researchers only have facility-level data) or are not analyzed in facility-level–only analyses.